Did anyone catch this line? "Underage performer" seems to imply that the children are not being exploited. Like they are just fulfilling their childhood dream or something ffs. Here is the quote:
"We believe it could lead to a sharp increase in the number of underage performers being exploited due to the removal of legal oversight and penalties for uploading or distributing images that feature minors."
Does it not sound like the intention is to cause more children to be exploited? What the fuck is an "underaged performer" in this fucking context??
They are implying that children have 'agency' and are able to make up their own minds about how and where to express their sexuality--that is how the porn industry, under the guise of 'civil liberties', will frame it. For now, it will be about 16-year-old children. That is the thin end of the wedge. It will then move to 15, 14, 13 and then into pre-teen.
It is the same argument used by pimps, brothel owners and sex buyers who exploit the women they prostitute. They say that women 'choose' to prostitute themselves. What they fail to mention is that women do this to survive, not because they enjoy it. There's a myth that prostitutes just love sex. It's bullshit. I know a few exited women and they end up really, really hating all men because of what they've had to put up with in the sex industry.
This argument will be used by the sex industry for the children too. It'll be 'children should have the freedom to express themselves how they see fit. If they choose to participate in porn, that is their choice'. Children will no longer be seen has having to be protected; they will be seen as having an adult's ability to discern.
Children who have already suffered abuse or have been groomed (and our culture does enough grooming of our children as it is) will, in an attempt to re-frame that trauma, will replay the role of victim and almost bond with the perpetrator (in this case the porn boss). It's a form of Stockholm Syndrome. I know a bit about trauma and I see the road our society is headed down. Children are being stripped of their innocence. We are allowing the world at large to pervert them. Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now. I hope to God that people will not stand for this.
Remember, 90% of all prostitutes and porn stars have been victims of childhood sexual abuse. And the other 10% are lying. No person with normal sexuality finds themselves in these "professions". And now they are victims who have become vicitmizers, putting their dysfunction in front of everyone to see and be corrupted by.
view the rest of the comments →
Criticalthinker615 ago
Did anyone catch this line? "Underage performer" seems to imply that the children are not being exploited. Like they are just fulfilling their childhood dream or something ffs. Here is the quote:
"We believe it could lead to a sharp increase in the number of underage performers being exploited due to the removal of legal oversight and penalties for uploading or distributing images that feature minors."
Does it not sound like the intention is to cause more children to be exploited? What the fuck is an "underaged performer" in this fucking context??
Piscina ago
They are implying that children have 'agency' and are able to make up their own minds about how and where to express their sexuality--that is how the porn industry, under the guise of 'civil liberties', will frame it. For now, it will be about 16-year-old children. That is the thin end of the wedge. It will then move to 15, 14, 13 and then into pre-teen.
It is the same argument used by pimps, brothel owners and sex buyers who exploit the women they prostitute. They say that women 'choose' to prostitute themselves. What they fail to mention is that women do this to survive, not because they enjoy it. There's a myth that prostitutes just love sex. It's bullshit. I know a few exited women and they end up really, really hating all men because of what they've had to put up with in the sex industry.
This argument will be used by the sex industry for the children too. It'll be 'children should have the freedom to express themselves how they see fit. If they choose to participate in porn, that is their choice'. Children will no longer be seen has having to be protected; they will be seen as having an adult's ability to discern.
Children who have already suffered abuse or have been groomed (and our culture does enough grooming of our children as it is) will, in an attempt to re-frame that trauma, will replay the role of victim and almost bond with the perpetrator (in this case the porn boss). It's a form of Stockholm Syndrome. I know a bit about trauma and I see the road our society is headed down. Children are being stripped of their innocence. We are allowing the world at large to pervert them. Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now. I hope to God that people will not stand for this.
FuriousYT ago
Remember, 90% of all prostitutes and porn stars have been victims of childhood sexual abuse. And the other 10% are lying. No person with normal sexuality finds themselves in these "professions". And now they are victims who have become vicitmizers, putting their dysfunction in front of everyone to see and be corrupted by.