I sometimes check snopes just to see how they skewed the truth to be able to deny a claim. It's good to be aware of the scummy tactics they use because when arguing with a leftie, they tend to cite snopes.
LOL - because OP was too lazy to google 'pedophile corpse judge' to see that the story went around on sites like neonnettle and yournewswire already in autumn 2017, and because I was too lazy to find another site that put all the facts about this story together like Snopes did. :-P
You are kindly welcome of course, to do a google search for yourself, and draw your own conclusions, without citing Snopes. ;-)
Snopes sucks, but 5% of the time they are useful, as in this case. ;;-P
Aww, I think I believed this report the 1st time round.......yeah, probably wishful thinking an my part. Justice needs to be done NOW! Tired of waiting.....though this was a fantastic video I watched today by One American News - **BREAKING: Charity Fraud at the Clinton Foundation - by Charles Ortel and his PROOF:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_Ts6mhpWJY** about their outright corruption.
@srayzie@honeybee_@carmecita@Vindicator@Cc1914
Well, you are kindly invited to spend time, do a background check, and find another link that debunks the story. I will gladly edit my mod comment then.
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
Hi @MolochHunter, I'm sorry, this didn't happen on Tuesday, as the site claims, it obviously didn't happen at all (has been discussed here before).
In this case, Snopes has actually been useful:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pedophiles-decapitated-corpse-found-on-judges-doorstep-after-bail-hearing/
Going to flair this 'Debunked'. Thanks. ;-)
MolochHunter ago
lol as if id go to snopes to check
wait... why would YOU go to snopes ?!?
Shizy ago
I sometimes check snopes just to see how they skewed the truth to be able to deny a claim. It's good to be aware of the scummy tactics they use because when arguing with a leftie, they tend to cite snopes.
think- ago
LOL - because OP was too lazy to google 'pedophile corpse judge' to see that the story went around on sites like neonnettle and yournewswire already in autumn 2017, and because I was too lazy to find another site that put all the facts about this story together like Snopes did. :-P
You are kindly welcome of course, to do a google search for yourself, and draw your own conclusions, without citing Snopes. ;-)
Snopes sucks, but 5% of the time they are useful, as in this case. ;;-P
MolochHunter ago
i always post the fake news here :)
its how we catalogue here whats real and whats fake !
thats my excuse for laziness, anyhoo
think- ago
LOL
TrishaUK ago
Aww, I think I believed this report the 1st time round.......yeah, probably wishful thinking an my part. Justice needs to be done NOW! Tired of waiting.....though this was a fantastic video I watched today by One American News - **BREAKING: Charity Fraud at the Clinton Foundation - by Charles Ortel and his PROOF:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_Ts6mhpWJY** about their outright corruption. @srayzie @honeybee_ @carmecita @Vindicator @Cc1914
Blacksmith21 ago
Snopes is worse than no link at all.
think- ago
Well, you are kindly invited to spend time, do a background check, and find another link that debunks the story. I will gladly edit my mod comment then.
See you guys.