A while back I saw a Satanist on Facebook posting a link to an article about someone getting busted for child porn or rape. There was an intermediary link to some Satanic blog that linked to the Daily Mail that showed that the dude who got busted was the high priest in some local group of Satanists. I lost the link and can no longer find the guy but the Daily Mail article made no mention of the convict being a Satanist. If you look a little deeper you might find out that all these pedos are secretly Satanists but the news never seems to report on it.
That's one of the big things they don't want you to know about, Satanists infiltrating the government / local churches, posing as Christians, what have you.
That's one of the big things they don't want you to know about, Satanists infiltrating the government / local churches, posing as Christians, what have you.
Shut the fuck up for once. Stop trying to convince everyone that Satanists aren’t bad!. It is absolutely ridiculous that you would try to convince a pizzagate community with this bullshit. Scientology and Satanism are SICK.
Your wannabe dragon ass is on my last nerve. Why would anyone on pizzagate want to take advice from someone who admittedly drinks human blood and defends Satanism? Who tells us that an upside down cross isn’t evil and told ME that Jesus was eaten as a baby?! You need to lay off the shrooms BRO.
I thought before, that maybe this freak was just high. He’s constantly trying to convince others, even on Twitter, that Satanism isn’t evil. Then he expects me to read his fricken series so I can know the truth. He gets pissed at anyone who doesn’t agree and expects us to take the time reading his lame shit that he writes while he’s tweeking. Maybe it’s all an act and he’s a paid shill.
Funny, srayz, I just wrote a PM to Vin a couple of minutes ago that I'm totally fed up now with @argosciv pushing Satanism here, and won't be silent any longer.
@argosciv: You realize that 99,99% of people here are anti-Satanism? So how come you attack a legit user here (@EffYouJohnPodesta), insinuating that she's a Scientologist, only because she doesn't like satanists? That's just ridiculous.
And how come you are trying to promote Freemasons and the OTO? Even trying to convince everybody that Michael Aquino is a totally innocent person? What exactly are you doing here on v/pizzagate, and why?
Don't you think it rings a bell when someone - you - who admitted having 'consensual' sex magick sessions with female teenagers, drinking their blood - pushes satanism, defends pedos like Michael Aquino, and attacks innocent users?
This is definitely not the right place where you are welcome with this shit.
You realize that 99,99% of people here are anti-Satanism?
I sure do, but, I don't accuse each and every one of shilling for Scientology. I keep an eye out for patterns that suggest an ulterior motive behind the anti-Satanist rhetoric.
And how come you are trying to promote Freemasons and the OTO? Even trying to convince everybody that Michael Aquino is a totally innocent person?
Because I actually took the time to read into what they're about(inc. Satanism), rather than freaking out over stolen and misused symbolism & a few bad apples(corrupt) in the bunch. I'm not promoting them any more than pointing out where bias, hysteria and disinfo/misinfo lead people to dead-ends and otherwise feed the Scientologist agenda.
What exactly are you doing here on v/pizzagate, and why?
Giving you everything you need, piece by piece, if you would only take the time to read.
Don't you think it rings a bell when someone - you - who admitted having 'consensual' sex magick sessions with female teenagers, drinking their blood, pushes satanism, defends pedos like Michael Aquino, and attacks innocent users?
I never once said I engaged in such an act with anyone underage - this has been assumed by those caught in a state of hysteria.
Prove Aquino is a pedo, like, actually prove it(not necessarily you personally, but, anyone with evidence of such). I've read what he's had to say on the matter and he seems credible.
This is definitely not the right place where you are welcome with this shit.
Go ahead and jump on the bandwagon then, what I'm working on at the moment will actually help all of you to see many missed connections - again, if you actually take the time to read.
Pinging @EricKaliberhall@ben_matlock, seeing as how they would have missed the notifs(only the first 5 pings of a post send out notifications)
It's ridiculous to call me a Scientologist, when everyone knows I am openly against Scientology. you're attempting to gaslight me but it's just stupid, I'm CORRECTING YOUR FAKE RECORD for lying about me. As far as I'm concerned you'd have to be a really good spy willing to spend your life pretending to be a retard, to sign up for that non-cult Intelligence front.
If you are against Scientology, that's great, seriously.
However, what a lot of people don't realize(largely because they refuse to read my work), is that anti-Satanist rhetoric helps Scientologists & other even-more nefarious parties.
If you are not trying to help them, then I implore you to take the time to look deeper - the chances of you doing so, are slim, though. If I'm wrong about your intentions, great, it's one less person I have to worry about.
You don't have to like Satanism at all, that's not even remotely my angle here, the point being that there is more to the picture than just, as you put it, gaslighting Satanists - I do not even myself, profess to be a Satanist.
anti-Satanist rhetoric helps Scientologists & other even-more nefarious parties.
Prove this without making me shovel your shit. I don't take well to that, and just like Cheeseboogersghost and SoberSecondThought, I will pick apart your words and destroy you if you can't.
I'm always suspicious about the overly-long-winded posts you and others make, and I more or less let them slide because I refuse to waste my time on someone's horseshit.
Shortest possible explanation, backed up by my research(currently published & still to come):
The propaganda which I speak of, started in it's earliest forms thousands of years ago and has evolved over time, to become what can be called anti-Satanist propaganda. How this was achieved is through storytelling and many crimes & inter-connected religious/territorial wars(including assassinations and the theft/suppression/destruction of historical artifacts and knowledge in the form of tablets, tomes and books, etc - massive trauma from these conflicts also causes immense psychological distress resulting in forgetfulness) in which propaganda is consistently used as a means to persuade populations to attack their neighbors, with some of the most damning and relevant examples being related to the conflicts in which we see Joan of Arc, Vlad II Dracul & Vlad III Dracula and the Báthory family - these 'iconic' persons/families have been portrayed as heretics/'monsters' or otherwise had their stories exploited in a way which distorts perceptions of the past, creating a weapon of sorts which we see utilized by particular persons of interest in Hollywood today - in particular, we see a lot of vampire movies with various manipulative undertones, along with many movies that use symbolism and storytelling to seed very morbid themes regarding "Satanists".
This weaponized propaganda has profound effects when combined with real-life situations allegedly involving Satanists - some indeed do involve people who have committed horrendous acts 'in the name of Satan', a perfect example there being Richard 'The Nightstalker' Ramirez(yet another RR) who did some seriously fucked up shit which the mainstream media of the time capitalized on as part of their pushing 'Satanic Panic'. Another example being the West Memphis 3, however, in that case, we see young Satanists taking the fall for a crime they did not commit. Yet another example being the McMartin Preschool incident, which never proved Satanist involvement beyond reasonable doubt. Then there's the MacDonald incident, another which never proved Satanist involvement. Just to name a few.
Note: Ted Gunderson's death and many other relevant deaths mirror the black and blue hands Erzsébet Báthory experienced the night before she died; arsenic/heavy-metal poisoning.
See also: New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Program; Scientology.
In following this trail of weaponized anti-Satanist propaganda in Hollywood and mainstream media/real life, I am led consistently to Scientologists and corrupted(blackmailed and/or malicious) persons in a variety of positions, but, this is not conducive enough to blame everything on "Satanists" or even all Freemasons(et al) as a whole, indeed, the more I look, the more I see a very different source of this propaganda, from 10's of thousands of years ago, up to today.
Part of weaponizing anti-Satanist propaganda is to time particular events such as assassinations and other global corruption, with 'the satanic calendar' - notably events in February, August and October, so as to enforce the idea that Satanists are to blame. Elements from many other religions are also utilized, so as to ramp up the morbidity and manipulation; Syncretism gone horribly wrong(intentionally).
The truly corrupt persons/entities want you to get hysterical over "Satanism"/Freemasons/OTO(et al) as a generalized group - rather than on a case-by-case basis, then blame everything on "Satan/Satanists", because until rather recently, it has served their agenda perfectly - ironically, those who were commissioned to pervert ancient knowledge, did so in a way that eventually people would start to connect the dots and see through the charade. For a way to put it, the Clintons(et al), walked right into a trap.
One more example of 'the media' drumming up anti-Satanist propaganda which I have not yet brought up, is the arson of churches over in Norway(between 1992 - 1993), involving Varg Vikernes and several others - which the media deliberately misconstrued and capitalized on, turning it into 'Satanic Panic' rather than addressing the reality of why the churches were burned and who actually set the fires.
On 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992.[6] Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church, respectively, in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo. He was also charged with the arson of Fantoft Stave Church, although the jurors found him not guilty. The judges called this an error but did not overthrow the whole case.[32]
At the time, claims were made by media outlets that Vikernes was associated with theistic Satanism.[33] However, in an interview with Michael Moynihan, Vikernes made a statement about the church burnings that hints at a heathen rather than a Satanist motivation:
I am not going to say that I burnt any churches. But let me put it this way: There was one person who started it. I was not found guilty of burning the Fantoft stave church, but anyway, that was what triggered the whole thing. That was the 6th of June and everyone linked it to Satanism ... What everyone overlooked was that on the 6th June, 793, in Lindesfarne in Britain was the site of the first known Viking raid in history, with Vikings from Hordaland, which is my county ... They [the Christians] desecrated our graves, our burial mounds, so it's revenge.[34]
Echoing this sentiment, he writes in Vargsmål: "For each devastated graveyard, one heathen grave is avenged, for each ten churches burnt to ashes, one heathen hof is avenged, for each ten priests or freemasons assassinated, one heathen is avenged."[35]
When asked whether the church burnings were linked to Odinism or Germanic neopaganism he replied: "The point is that all these churches [i.e. church burnings] are linked to one person ... who was not Øystein obviously. All the church burnings, with the exception of Stavanger, because that was another group—who, by the way, have also turned into nationalistic pagans."[36]
I sincerely recommend getting your hands on the documentary titled "Until the Light Takes Us"(NSFW warning), which includes several interviews with the people involved & a trove of other footage/material relevant to the situation. I have just sat here transcribing the following, as best I could.
Noteworthy from an interview with Varg:
VV: starting at 0hr:56min:23sec
"It didn't turn out the way I wanted it to be, but it uh, it sure changed a lot - they started to pretend that there was some Satanic movement and conspiracy in society - that the people burning churches were really Satanists who planned to spread evil and all this crap and when I got out of prison, there was nothing I could do about it.
I told them, "This has nothing to do with Satanism", and they never paid any attention to what I said. Even Øystein was never a Satanist - nobody was Satanists, but, this was all about demonizing a movement; they wanted us to be Satanists"
Also noteworthy, is that which is said by Olve "Abbath" Eikemo of the band "IMMORTAL", then that which is said by Varg in the same interview as above:
OE: starting at 1hr:20min:17sec
"He fucked up. He's a very intelligent guy, he's a very talented guy, but uh, he wanted to live differently from us so he decided to burn these churches. It must have been a hell of a rush for him... but uh, now he's in jail, and uh that must suck for him, but, y'know, he has himself to thank for it."
VV: starting at 1hr:20mins:55sec
"It's very hard to recognize the truth when you are bombarded by lies all the time, every minute of the day - you have to go to sleep and even in sleep, because you dream of the presence you have during the day. Y'know, you are bombarded by commercials and completely senseless information every single day. If you turn on the TV you're bombarded, if you turn your head in some direction you see some sign, some commercial. Y'know, you read magazines, newspaper - senseless information - the news are themselves products being sold; everything is meaningless.
Sure, the truth is out there - I know I sound like some X-Files, but the truth is of course to be found, but, in a sea of lies it's just impossible to find it - unless you know how to look, where to look and when to look & uh, of course, it's not possible to just, y'know, get up in the morning and say, "Okay, I'm gonna find the truth this day", y'know, and go find it.
You have to try and fail and eventually you'll weed out all the lies and you end up with something at least similar to the truth.
The truth is hidden in the grass, under some rocks, in a hidden trail - a forgotten trail - in the forest and when you try to find these trails you will stumble, you will get some branches in your face; you'll make mistakes before you finally find it"
So, what does this prove? Well, it proves that international religious zealots, mainstream media and their puppet masters have consistently tried to push the public to blame Satan/Satanists and have also capitalized on the ignorance of labeling morbid events and various groups as "Satanic"
Many more examples exist in support of this, some of which will be explored in the final entries of Root of Corruption per what is most relevant to corruption of the last 100 years. I have 3-4 more coming, ideally.
This is as condensed as the crux of my research can be.
Shortest possible explanation, backed up by my research(currently published & still to come):
SHORTEST POSSIBLE!
The propaganda which I speak of, started in it's earliest forms thousands of years ago and has evolved over time, to become what can be called anti-Satanist propaganda.
This sentence is argumentatively null. It's storytelling.
How this was achieved is through storytelling and many crimes & inter-connected religious/territorial wars(including assassinations and the theft/suppression/destruction of historical artifacts and knowledge in the form of tablets, tomes and books, etc - massive trauma from these conflicts also causes immense psychological distress resulting in forgetfulness) in which propaganda is consistently used as a means to persuade populations to attack their neighbors, with some of the most damning and relevant examples being related to the conflicts in which we see Joan of Arc, Vlad II Dracul & Vlad III Dracula and the Báthory family - these 'iconic' persons/families have been portrayed as heretics/'monsters' or otherwise had their stories exploited in a way which distorts perceptions of the past, creating a weapon of sorts which we see utilized by particular persons of interest in Hollywood today - in particular, we see a lot of vampire movies with various manipulative undertones, along with many movies that use symbolism and storytelling to seed very morbid themes regarding "Satanists".
I only see one period in that.
"How this was achieved is through storytelling"
Kind of like your first sentence? And this run-on?
This weaponized propaganda has profound effects when combined with real-life situations allegedly involving Satanists - some indeed do involve people who have committed horrendous acts 'in the name of Satan', a perfect example there being Richard 'The Nightstalker' Ramirez(yet another RR) who did some seriously fucked up shit which the mainstream media of the time capitalized on as part of their pushing 'Satanic Panic'. Another example being the West Memphis 3, however, in that case, we see young Satanists taking the fall for a crime they did not commit. Yet another example being the McMartin Preschool incident, which never proved Satanist involvement beyond reasonable doubt. Then there's the MacDonald incident, another which never proved Satanist involvement. Just to name a few.
More storytelling. Just a bunch of claims, no facts or evidence or even an argument, really. You're just claiming things without supporting them at all.
Note: Ted Gunderson's death and many other relevant deaths mirror the black and blue hands Erzsébet Báthory experienced the night before she died; arsenic/heavy-metal poisoning.
Why does anyone give a shit?
See also: New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Program; Scientology.
You haven't linked this to satanism.
In following this trail of weaponized anti-Satanist propaganda in Hollywood and mainstream media/real life, I am led consistently to Scientologists and corrupted(blackmailed and/or malicious) persons in a variety of positions, but, this is not conducive enough to blame everything on "Satanists" or even all Freemasons(et al) as a whole, indeed, the more I look, the more I see a very different source of this propaganda, from 10's of thousands of years ago, up to today.
And yet you can't seem to back up a single claim.
Part of weaponizing anti-Satanist propaganda is to time particular events such as assassinations and other global corruption, with 'the satanic calendar' - notably events in February, August and October, so as to enforce the idea that Satanists are to blame. Elements from many other religions are also utilized, so as to ramp up the morbidity and manipulation; Syncretism gone horribly wrong(intentionally).
Claim, claim, claim, claim, claim, claim...
The truly corrupt persons/entities want you to get hysterical over "Satanism"/Freemasons/OTO(et al) as a generalized group - rather than on a case-by-case basis, then blame everything on "Satan/Satanists", because until rather recently, it has served their agenda perfectly - ironically, those who were commissioned to pervert ancient knowledge, did so in a way that eventually people would start to connect the dots and see through the charade. For a way to put it, the Clintons(et al), walked right into a trap.
The Clintons just appeared out of nowhere here in an attempt to legitimize your horseshit. No evidence at all for any of this.
One more example of 'the media' drumming up anti-Satanist propaganda which I have not yet brought up, is the arson of churches over in Norway(between 1992 - 1993), involving Varg Vikernes and several others - which the media deliberately misconstrued and capitalized on, turning it into 'Satanic Panic' rather than addressing the reality of why the churches were burned and who actually set the fires.
Not that I trust the media, but support your claims.
wiki: Varg Vikernes: Arson of churches:
Ok, you got the media claiming satanism instead of paganism. WOOO, you've convinced me!
/s
I sincerely recommend getting your hands on the documentary titled "Until the Light Takes Us"(NSFW warning), which includes several interviews with the people involved & a trove of other footage/material relevant to the situation. I have just sat here transcribing the following, as best I could.
I sincerely recommend getting your sources straight and not pointing me to time-wasting bullshit to corroborate your unnecessarily long, masturbatory storytelling.
VV: starting at 0hr:56min:23sec
So, the same guy, saying the same thing. Once instance.
OE: starting at 1hr:20min:17sec
A buddy of the guy, saying effectively nothing.
VV: starting at 1hr:20mins:55sec
The same guy saying more shit.
Literally all you've proven here is that the media was wrong about ONE guy. It took you ALL of this so far to get ONE GUY who was lied about.
/golfclap
So, what does this prove? Well, it proves that international religious zealots, mainstream media and their puppet masters have consistently tried to push the public to blame Satan/Satanists and have also capitalized on the ignorance of labeling morbid events and various groups as "Satanic"
No, it doesn't.
Many more examples exist in support of this, some of which will be explored in the final entries of Root of Corruption per what is most relevant to corruption of the last 100 years. I have 3-4 more coming, ideally.
3 or 4 doesn't really make good evidence, either, though it might have been worth looking into if you didn't need 10,000 words to point out ONE guy that was lied about.
This is as condensed as the crux of my research can be.
Then you are too stupid to be presenting it to anyone else.
It's true that if you cannot explain something complicated simply and succinctly, that you do not understand it well enough to explain it or teach it.
I could have gained the same ground as you, for literally anyone reading this, in one paragraph. I would have convinced someone JUST AS WELL at the VERY least, (probably better) that VV was lied about.
So he’s explained how our views on Satanism have been shaped by the news and entertainment industry. That’s it. Nothing to show how Satanism isn’t dark and evil.
view the rest of the comments →
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
A while back I saw a Satanist on Facebook posting a link to an article about someone getting busted for child porn or rape. There was an intermediary link to some Satanic blog that linked to the Daily Mail that showed that the dude who got busted was the high priest in some local group of Satanists. I lost the link and can no longer find the guy but the Daily Mail article made no mention of the convict being a Satanist. If you look a little deeper you might find out that all these pedos are secretly Satanists but the news never seems to report on it.
That's one of the big things they don't want you to know about, Satanists infiltrating the government / local churches, posing as Christians, what have you.
disclaimer: not a Q anon follower
argosciv ago
Cram it, Scientologist shill.
Indeed, you just described Scientologists to a T.
Moreover, your self-advertising is disgusting.
srayzie ago
Shut the fuck up for once. Stop trying to convince everyone that Satanists aren’t bad!. It is absolutely ridiculous that you would try to convince a pizzagate community with this bullshit. Scientology and Satanism are SICK.
Your wannabe dragon ass is on my last nerve. Why would anyone on pizzagate want to take advice from someone who admittedly drinks human blood and defends Satanism? Who tells us that an upside down cross isn’t evil and told ME that Jesus was eaten as a baby?! You need to lay off the shrooms BRO.
@Vindicator @Think-
I thought before, that maybe this freak was just high. He’s constantly trying to convince others, even on Twitter, that Satanism isn’t evil. Then he expects me to read his fricken series so I can know the truth. He gets pissed at anyone who doesn’t agree and expects us to take the time reading his lame shit that he writes while he’s tweeking. Maybe it’s all an act and he’s a paid shill.
think- ago
Funny, srayz, I just wrote a PM to Vin a couple of minutes ago that I'm totally fed up now with @argosciv pushing Satanism here, and won't be silent any longer.
@argosciv: You realize that 99,99% of people here are anti-Satanism? So how come you attack a legit user here (@EffYouJohnPodesta), insinuating that she's a Scientologist, only because she doesn't like satanists? That's just ridiculous.
And how come you are trying to promote Freemasons and the OTO? Even trying to convince everybody that Michael Aquino is a totally innocent person? What exactly are you doing here on v/pizzagate, and why?
Don't you think it rings a bell when someone - you - who admitted having 'consensual' sex magick sessions with female teenagers, drinking their blood - pushes satanism, defends pedos like Michael Aquino, and attacks innocent users?
This is definitely not the right place where you are welcome with this shit.
@Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock @EffYouJohnPodesta
argosciv ago
LOL! For fuck's sake you lot.
I sure do, but, I don't accuse each and every one of shilling for Scientology. I keep an eye out for patterns that suggest an ulterior motive behind the anti-Satanist rhetoric.
Because I actually took the time to read into what they're about(inc. Satanism), rather than freaking out over stolen and misused symbolism & a few bad apples(corrupt) in the bunch. I'm not promoting them any more than pointing out where bias, hysteria and disinfo/misinfo lead people to dead-ends and otherwise feed the Scientologist agenda.
Giving you everything you need, piece by piece, if you would only take the time to read.
I never once said I engaged in such an act with anyone underage - this has been assumed by those caught in a state of hysteria.
Prove Aquino is a pedo, like, actually prove it(not necessarily you personally, but, anyone with evidence of such). I've read what he's had to say on the matter and he seems credible.
Go ahead and jump on the bandwagon then, what I'm working on at the moment will actually help all of you to see many missed connections - again, if you actually take the time to read.
Pinging @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock, seeing as how they would have missed the notifs(only the first 5 pings of a post send out notifications)
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
It's ridiculous to call me a Scientologist, when everyone knows I am openly against Scientology. you're attempting to gaslight me but it's just stupid, I'm CORRECTING YOUR FAKE RECORD for lying about me. As far as I'm concerned you'd have to be a really good spy willing to spend your life pretending to be a retard, to sign up for that non-cult Intelligence front.
argosciv ago
If you are against Scientology, that's great, seriously.
However, what a lot of people don't realize(largely because they refuse to read my work), is that anti-Satanist rhetoric helps Scientologists & other even-more nefarious parties.
If you are not trying to help them, then I implore you to take the time to look deeper - the chances of you doing so, are slim, though. If I'm wrong about your intentions, great, it's one less person I have to worry about.
You don't have to like Satanism at all, that's not even remotely my angle here, the point being that there is more to the picture than just, as you put it, gaslighting Satanists - I do not even myself, profess to be a Satanist.
Crensch ago
Prove this without making me shovel your shit. I don't take well to that, and just like Cheeseboogersghost and SoberSecondThought, I will pick apart your words and destroy you if you can't.
I'm always suspicious about the overly-long-winded posts you and others make, and I more or less let them slide because I refuse to waste my time on someone's horseshit.
@Vindicator @srayzie @think-
argosciv ago
Shortest possible explanation, backed up by my research(currently published & still to come):
The propaganda which I speak of, started in it's earliest forms thousands of years ago and has evolved over time, to become what can be called anti-Satanist propaganda. How this was achieved is through storytelling and many crimes & inter-connected religious/territorial wars(including assassinations and the theft/suppression/destruction of historical artifacts and knowledge in the form of tablets, tomes and books, etc - massive trauma from these conflicts also causes immense psychological distress resulting in forgetfulness) in which propaganda is consistently used as a means to persuade populations to attack their neighbors, with some of the most damning and relevant examples being related to the conflicts in which we see Joan of Arc, Vlad II Dracul & Vlad III Dracula and the Báthory family - these 'iconic' persons/families have been portrayed as heretics/'monsters' or otherwise had their stories exploited in a way which distorts perceptions of the past, creating a weapon of sorts which we see utilized by particular persons of interest in Hollywood today - in particular, we see a lot of vampire movies with various manipulative undertones, along with many movies that use symbolism and storytelling to seed very morbid themes regarding "Satanists".
This weaponized propaganda has profound effects when combined with real-life situations allegedly involving Satanists - some indeed do involve people who have committed horrendous acts 'in the name of Satan', a perfect example there being Richard 'The Nightstalker' Ramirez(yet another RR) who did some seriously fucked up shit which the mainstream media of the time capitalized on as part of their pushing 'Satanic Panic'. Another example being the West Memphis 3, however, in that case, we see young Satanists taking the fall for a crime they did not commit. Yet another example being the McMartin Preschool incident, which never proved Satanist involvement beyond reasonable doubt. Then there's the MacDonald incident, another which never proved Satanist involvement. Just to name a few.
Note: Ted Gunderson's death and many other relevant deaths mirror the black and blue hands Erzsébet Báthory experienced the night before she died; arsenic/heavy-metal poisoning.
See also: New York Rescue Workers Detoxification Program; Scientology.
In following this trail of weaponized anti-Satanist propaganda in Hollywood and mainstream media/real life, I am led consistently to Scientologists and corrupted(blackmailed and/or malicious) persons in a variety of positions, but, this is not conducive enough to blame everything on "Satanists" or even all Freemasons(et al) as a whole, indeed, the more I look, the more I see a very different source of this propaganda, from 10's of thousands of years ago, up to today.
Part of weaponizing anti-Satanist propaganda is to time particular events such as assassinations and other global corruption, with 'the satanic calendar' - notably events in February, August and October, so as to enforce the idea that Satanists are to blame. Elements from many other religions are also utilized, so as to ramp up the morbidity and manipulation; Syncretism gone horribly wrong(intentionally).
The truly corrupt persons/entities want you to get hysterical over "Satanism"/Freemasons/OTO(et al) as a generalized group - rather than on a case-by-case basis, then blame everything on "Satan/Satanists", because until rather recently, it has served their agenda perfectly - ironically, those who were commissioned to pervert ancient knowledge, did so in a way that eventually people would start to connect the dots and see through the charade. For a way to put it, the Clintons(et al), walked right into a trap.
One more example of 'the media' drumming up anti-Satanist propaganda which I have not yet brought up, is the arson of churches over in Norway(between 1992 - 1993), involving Varg Vikernes and several others - which the media deliberately misconstrued and capitalized on, turning it into 'Satanic Panic' rather than addressing the reality of why the churches were burned and who actually set the fires.
wiki: Varg Vikernes: Arson of churches:
I sincerely recommend getting your hands on the documentary titled "Until the Light Takes Us"(NSFW warning), which includes several interviews with the people involved & a trove of other footage/material relevant to the situation. I have just sat here transcribing the following, as best I could.
Noteworthy from an interview with Varg:
VV: starting at 0hr:56min:23sec
Also noteworthy, is that which is said by Olve "Abbath" Eikemo of the band "IMMORTAL", then that which is said by Varg in the same interview as above:
OE: starting at 1hr:20min:17sec
VV: starting at 1hr:20mins:55sec
So, what does this prove? Well, it proves that international religious zealots, mainstream media and their puppet masters have consistently tried to push the public to blame Satan/Satanists and have also capitalized on the ignorance of labeling morbid events and various groups as "Satanic"
Many more examples exist in support of this, some of which will be explored in the final entries of Root of Corruption per what is most relevant to corruption of the last 100 years. I have 3-4 more coming, ideally.
This is as condensed as the crux of my research can be.
Crensch ago
SHORTEST POSSIBLE!
This sentence is argumentatively null. It's storytelling.
I only see one period in that.
"How this was achieved is through storytelling"
Kind of like your first sentence? And this run-on?
More storytelling. Just a bunch of claims, no facts or evidence or even an argument, really. You're just claiming things without supporting them at all.
Why does anyone give a shit?
You haven't linked this to satanism.
And yet you can't seem to back up a single claim.
Claim, claim, claim, claim, claim, claim...
The Clintons just appeared out of nowhere here in an attempt to legitimize your horseshit. No evidence at all for any of this.
Not that I trust the media, but support your claims.
Ok, you got the media claiming satanism instead of paganism. WOOO, you've convinced me!
/s
I sincerely recommend getting your sources straight and not pointing me to time-wasting bullshit to corroborate your unnecessarily long, masturbatory storytelling.
So, the same guy, saying the same thing. Once instance.
A buddy of the guy, saying effectively nothing.
The same guy saying more shit.
Literally all you've proven here is that the media was wrong about ONE guy. It took you ALL of this so far to get ONE GUY who was lied about.
/golfclap
No, it doesn't.
3 or 4 doesn't really make good evidence, either, though it might have been worth looking into if you didn't need 10,000 words to point out ONE guy that was lied about.
Then you are too stupid to be presenting it to anyone else.
It's true that if you cannot explain something complicated simply and succinctly, that you do not understand it well enough to explain it or teach it.
I could have gained the same ground as you, for literally anyone reading this, in one paragraph. I would have convinced someone JUST AS WELL at the VERY least, (probably better) that VV was lied about.
You're a clown.
@srayzie @Shizy @Vindicator
srayzie ago
So he’s explained how our views on Satanism have been shaped by the news and entertainment industry. That’s it. Nothing to show how Satanism isn’t dark and evil.
Crensch ago
He didn't even really explain that. ALL he did was show that the MSM lied about one dude.