You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Lordbananafist ago

Anybody ever consider that maybe you shouldn't rush to get affiliated with a blood relative of a satanic priestess just because she told you about some case law from 1973??

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Law is law. Not all of us love each member of our family as you do.

One thing will never change - a person will always need to cite previous case law to argue their side in court in order to win.

If you don't like or believe the messenger, then try your best to ignore them and just look at the info they're providing.

Lordbananafist ago

Why would I ignore her status as a blood relative of abramovich???

We don't know by which corruption vector these people operate...

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

My only problem with Peterson is that she mentions what religion she is. That struck me as odd, so I looked into it. Yes, it's a red flag. While I didn't exactly see anything they do that I would agree with or find harmful, Jainism has nothing to do with God as far as I saw.

Lordbananafist ago

Neat story...

let me be the first to inform you then that you'll never ever be in charge of any secured areas or gates

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

What makes you think I want to be in charge of any secure areas?

Lordbananafist ago

Because you think it's a good idea to get involved with the fucking niece of Marina abramovich?? Can I reinvent the wheel for you as well?

Why even mention the source at all?? All this shits available on findlaw probably

This is too strange toooooo fucking strange

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

There you go again with misleading context by creating a narrative that I'm getting involved or affiliating myself with her. You make it sounds as though I've invited her to dinner. Get a fucking grip.

I HAVE NOT SPOKEN TO HER! I HAVE NOT ENGAGED WITH HER AT ALL! This is a link to a thread about her posts.

@NASAspecialops - @LordBananafist has some issues with the info you originally posted to v/politics. Can you help clear things up?

Lordbananafist ago

"Is on our side"

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Yes, she is AFFLILIATING HERSELF WITH US

You're a thread sliding punk.

Lordbananafist ago

lol

Lordbananafist ago

Lol you wrote the title

And now unprovoked ad hominem... ok buddy

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

All you do is talk is circles about shit that doesn't matter.

Lordbananafist ago

right sounds good

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Is it related or unrelated to the info she provided? What if she were just a Harvard student who wasn't related to MA?

Also, you're the one who mentioned affiliation. I don't consider myself to be affiliating with her just by passing on her info. If anything, she's the one affiliating herself with us as the PG collective.

Lordbananafist ago

ITS HIGHLY RELATED.

WTF

I hope you lawyer better than you opsec because inviting this person onboard is fucking insane

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

You're right. Everybody should focus just on this, and slide the thread, so nobody is looking at the law info.

As far as I can see, Peterson never once claims to be Abramovic's niece. Maybe you need to ask the original thread's author why they put this info in the title.

Maybe I should delete this thread and change the title to 'Minnesota Law student is on our side with bombshell info.'

PollyPeterson ago

Marina was the one who posted it.

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Why don't you enter the live thread about this? https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2652549

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Where? I need a link.