Since Congress passed a law in 1987 preventing vaccine manufacturers from being sued for damages, a whole new ramped up vaccine schedule was foisted on the unsuspecting public and included, for the first time, a vaccine for newborns. And what would that be? HEPATITIS B shot (which contained 25 micrograms of mercury), which would allegedly protect these SEXUALLY ACTIVE INFANTS (sarc) from getting the dreaded disease. Of course this statement sounds ludicrous, and parents just assumed it was for protection "down the road" Hep. B is transmitted during sexual contact or via contact with infected blood. The risk of catching this disease, in the US, is small unless you work in a hospital, are a sex worker, or an IV drug user that shares needles. Now, with the covers coming off of heinous pedo crimes against INFANTS, I am wondering if this was why they were given the vaccine?
In 1999, a secret CDC report linked this vaccine with Autism, by only looking at the 25 micrograms of mercury it contained. For years, parents have suspected a vaccine - autism link. Now, NEW SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE shows that the vaccine causes BRAIN DAMAGE in monkeys. InfoWars (now banned from You Tube) just did a story on the Chinese researchers who made this discovery:
STUDY: FIRST VACCINE GIVEN TO MOST AMERICAN NEWBORNS CAUSES BRAIN DAMAGE
Hep B vaccine reportedly hurts brain development, cognition
JB Handley | World Mercury Project - JULY 27, 2018
“This study used the same vaccine and a similar time schedule to those used for human infant vaccination in China. Therefore, these findings suggest that there may be similar effects of neonatal HBV vaccination on brain development and behavior in humans.”
https://www.infowars.com/study-first-vaccine-given-to-most-american-newborns-causes-brain-damage/
view the rest of the comments →
Pizzalawyer ago
Half a dozen sexually transmitted diseases can infect a fetus or newborn baby delivered vaginally. But I assume this happens to a small maybe even a tiny percentage of mothers so why a blanket vaccine for every baby especially when several of the diseases can be cured if and when.the baby does become infected. There should be a mandatory screening of mothers at the late stage of pregnancy and a risk assessment done before any such vaccination. And the mother's colostrum should be collected following birth and given to the newborn even if she doesnt want to breastfeed.
The dangers of harmful substances is one issue. The other is the sheer number of vaccinations imposed upon babies. In real life, no infant or adult is ever exposed to all sexually transmitted diseases together with measles,mumps ,chicken pox, small pox, polio, tetanus, diptheria, all varieties of hepatitus and flu, and so on. Once I added up all the shots and boosters and it came to fifty or more innoculations. It makes no.sense to massively challenge the immune system of a young and rapidly growing human. It doesnt happen in nature so why do it artificially. In addition to safety issues we need to rethink the timing of these vaccinations and whether multiple vaccines in a single shot should ever be used. I sympathize with parents today who have to grapple with.these matters.
septimasexta ago
Well said. My other concern is that with the huge increase in autism cases, these children will be especially targeted for child trafficking.
Sexual Abuse of Children with Autism: Factors that Increase Risk and Interfere with Recognition of Abuse
"Two main arguments are made with regard to children with autism and risk for sexual abuse. First, some children with autism may be targeted for abuse by sexual offenders who may view them as vulnerable children. Second, when children with autism are sexually abused, they may show this in ways that get ignored or misattributed to autism rather than to possible sexual abuse." http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1058/1228
septimasexta ago
We have discussed a vaccine / trafficking link on VOAT before. Are they creating their own "supply?"