Look up the word "InfoWars" on google right now. Multiple MSM websites are calling for InfoWars to be banned and mentioning Pizzagate.
https://www.google.com/search?q=infowars&oq=infowars&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i60l4j35i39.928j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
USA Today:
"Facebook taking heat over its approach to Infowars; here's what you need to know"
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2018/07/15/facebook-infowars-what-you-need-know/786388002/
Does Facebook have an Infowars problem? That depends on who you ask.
Since the social networking giant held an event last week to tout how it's fighting false news and misinformation, Facebook has faced some blowback for how it handles Infowars, the far-right site led by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.
Since misinformation on the internet during the 2016 presidential campaign sharpened political divisions, Facebook has publicly mounted an offensive against the spread of false news on its network.
But many journalists have challenged Facebook saying if the site is truly fighting the spread of misinformation, how can it justify continuing to allow an official page for Infowars, which has propagated stories about hoaxes such as Pizzagate, and most recently, the Democrats' plan on July 4th to attempt to foment a civil war."
Jones also promoted the Pizzagate conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton operated a child sex ring at Comet Ping Pong, a pizza restaurant in Washington, D.C. On Dec. 4, 2016, a North Carolina man opened fire inside the pizza shop. Jones apologized to the restaurant owner.
CNN:
"Facebook touts fight on fake news, but struggles to explain why InfoWars isn't banned"
https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/11/media/facebook-infowars/index.html
CNET:
"7 questions Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg needs to answer about InfoWars"
https://www.cnet.com/news/seven-questions-facebooks-mark-zuckerberg-needs-to-answer-about-infowars/
Just ask the Sandy Hook parents tormented by InfoWars' followers, or the shooter who stormed into Comet Ping Pong pizzeria, in Washington, DC, to rescue children trapped in a sex-slave ring that didn't exist.
Business Insider:
"Facebook won't ban Infowars in its fake-news purge — a site that says 9/11 was staged and the moon landing was fake"
The phrase "fake news" has seen its meaning blur over time. Around 2016 it was widely used to describe false or misleading news designed to influence social-media users politically or to gain advertising dollars, but President Donald Trump hasince popularized it as a phrase to dismiss coverage he doesn't like or to discredit accidental mistakes made by news organizations.
Infowars, whose Facebook page has almost 1 million followers, is known for pushing conspiracy theories on its site and on YouTube. Its host Alex Jones has claimed that the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax with actors. The outlet has also said 9/11 was a so-called false flag and that the moon landings were faked. Jones also promoted the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, for which he apologized after being threatened with lawsuits."
Has Alex Jones said something damning recently about Pizzagate or about to? It seems like all of a sudden InfoWars is being attacked and there's a call across MSM to ban it and they all keep mentioning Pizzagate. Why?
view the rest of the comments →
300_Black ago
Infowars is MSM and Alex Jones is a crypto-Zionist.
If you're still watching Infowars, I have bad news for you.
But please, buy my vitality pills!
22trilionAsecond ago
It would be nice If AJ distanced himself from Jewish poisons AKA processed factory farm shit.
Mumbleberry ago
It would be nicer if you choke to death on a brussel sprout today.
22trilionAsecond ago
Brussel sprouts are cruciferous vegetables.
Cruciferous vegetables boost testosterone.
Mumbleberry ago
Will also lodge in the throat nicely. Hint hint.
22trilionAsecond ago
Chocking to death or rapidly losing control over your body and mind as you age.
Alzheimer and erectile dysfunction are linked to eating animal products.
I should be doing hand stands at 100.
If you cant squat at 70 you know you are fucked.
gamepwn ago
Maybe, but why the sudden mass call to ban it? All of the MSM are bringing up Pizzagate in their articles.
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
You really can't think of an answer to that? Anybody red pilled and aware in here?
Zorrilla ago
I think Alex Jones is controlled opposition, but he is not 100% controlled. He seems to be able to talk about things until someone in the CIA or something tells him to stop talking about that thing, e.g. Pizzagate. In spite of being controlled, he still gets a lot of true information out to a lot of people.
There is an election coming up in a few months, and Alex Jones, with his large following, might have enough influence to threaten the Democrats, so they want to shut him down well in advance. Also, there might be some damning information set to be released which they don't want Jones talking about.
I think they are bringing up Pizzagate and Sandy Hook because they assume that their readers think that those two "conspiracy theories" are some of the most shameful, disgusting, poisonous, irresponsible and socially dangerous ideas Jones has ever promoted. They probably think that bringing these up will foment public outrage against Alex Jones and contribute to him being shut out of the sphere of public discourse for good. This is just my opinion.
septimasexta ago
Alex Jones Info-Wars has always been a straw-man. The power of the truther/research community is that it is decentralized (that's why Communists always organize by "cell groups") and the MSM needs a single target to effectively neutralize it. Sights like VOAT are a big concern for them. We are winning. Over the years, and recently, I have seen a HUGE amount of red pilling evidence by monitoring the comments of You Tube, MSM websites, etc. Have you noticed that many MSM news sites no longer allow comments? VOAT has continually been exposing Pizzagate - not Alex Jones.
Here are some of Alex Jones' questionable associations:
"The Alex Jones and Bronfman connection So with the NXIVM news featuring, to name two smallville Allison Mack and the Bronfmans, I came across what I realized to be old news Alex Jones has a strange, seemingly benign connection with the Bronfmans. Uses same lawyer and uses the same address as them, as well as 25 pages worth of other companies, it's a huge building. Also on same floor according to filings, which in itself doesn't mean or imply anything. Alex Jones and the Bronfmans lawyer is Elizabeth M Schurig see here. She is a Bronfman super lawyer. Holly M Bronfman, sister of Edgar Jr. Bronfman, son of Edgar Bronfman that appears in the address book (black book) of Jeffrey Epstein see here. Holly Bronfman, also known as Bhavani Lev, or Holly B. Lev. So, the BET LEV foundation, see here has Holly as the director, and Elizabeth as as the registered agent. Here is the filing for Infowars - see here. However, Magnolia Holdings as the governing authority, not Alex Jones until it was updated. (Which seems to just be another company on the list of many others, such as Infowars, Prison Planet, Free Speech Systems and so on.) See here http://seektress.com/soc11.pdf Magnolia Holdings seems to be the ghost here, I've checked for places in Austin TX, none seem to fit the bill. Okay it's Alaska / AK and just looks like another company Elizabeth setup for AJ https://www.bizapedia.com/ak/magnolia-management-llc.html David Sewell was originally the Alex Jones lawyer, another "super" lawyer apparently, assigned to Jones from around May 2007 until Elizabeth seemingly took over the duties and began filing all the Infowars companies and so on from Nov 2007 onwards Sewell - http://sbaustinlaw.com/attorneys/david-sewell/ So if the website is correct, he would've been his Stahl, Bernal, Davies, Sewell, & Chavarria, LLP lawyer for his Alex Jones companies, which was stopped after the Emeric productions filing when Elizabeth took over filing for Infowars, Prisonplanet and others. This was the time when she was filing the governing authority as Magnolia Holdings LP. The building and address of infowars dot com governing authority Alex Jones from 2007 onwards - https://100congressave.com/leasing-management I was using corporate wiki and https://www.bizapedia.com/ to look into names and so on, struggled to find anything on Magnolia Holdings LP in Austin TX, at least at the address stated. Looking at the numbers Magnolia Holdings would've been around from November 2007 to first quarter of 2008, at the very least. Which, upon further digging, appears to just be another company, except at one point Kelly Jones was the manager, pretty normal so whatever. Main thing I'm curious about, is who Alex Jones handed over governing authority to, with the creation of Infowars and so on, through his Bronfman lawyer, Elizabeth Scurig. No idea how to look into history of manager roll so can't see if Elizabeth was ever more than his filer as a manager etc. Stuff without links should be sourced through here link which is an extensive piece on AJ, but tbh I couldn't care less I just want to figure out the Bronfman reach and see if it extends to other dodgy shit such as Nixim whatever it's called." https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8jvsw6/the_alex_jones_and_bronfman_connection/
InfoWars' Alex Jones Is a 'Performance Artist,' His Lawyer Says in Divorce Hearing
“He’s playing a character” and is nothing like his online persona, attorney Randall Wilhite reportedly insisted in a Texas courtroom at a pre-trial hearing ahead of the right wing radio jock’s custody battle with ex-wife Kelly Jones." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/not-fake-news-infowars-alex-jones-performance-artist-n747491
Alex Jones’ Ex-Wife Seeks Stormy Daniels’ Lawyer in Custody Battle Ex-wife appears to be in the game. She uses the children to claim Jones' conspiracy beliefs (most are classic alt-news) are dangerous. So, the MSM meme is "conspiracy researchers are dangerous to CHILDREN." Did a pedo write that script? Kelly Jones filed for divorce from Alex Jones in 2013 and has been involved in a long-running custody battle to see her three children. She told Newsweek that her ex-husband is not acting in his role on “Info Wars” and that he believes all of his theories.
"Kelly Jones filed for divorce from Alex Jones in 2013 and has been involved in a long-running custody battle to see her three children. She told Newsweek that her ex-husband is not acting in his role on “Info Wars” and that he believes all of his theories."
"Jones repeatedly referred to her ex-husband as a “vengeful narcissist” and added that his recent behavior has been “irresponsible and endangering” to her and her children..." https://www.thewrap.com/alex-jones-ex-wife-seeks-stormy-daniels-lawyer-in-custody-battle/
Once Cooper was out of the way, Jones filled the "void"..... Alex Jones Exposed by Milton William Cooper https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7jJMYJbAKc
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
He is 100% theirs, and this is like the Trump psyop, they seek to legitimize him by acting like he is their enemy.
Enigmatic_Continuum ago
Agreed. A few years ago, I decided he was not someone to be taking seriously, then he apologized to Alefantis, and I haven't looked in his direction since.
Mylon ago
Shutting down Infowars will likely be a net positive. Someone else will rise to fill that void. Hopefully someone less controlled. And the act of shutting it down itself would be one of those "hmm" moments.
think- ago
I agree with you that he's controlled opposition. And that's exactly what a limited hangout does: providing some valid info, mixed with false ones.
rarepeeks ago
Yup. There is one that works this sub regularly. He used to be crafty but after outed has started to go full troll mode.
https://files.catbox.moe/4x49he.PNG
https://files.catbox.moe/25mwhi.PNG
Waiyu_Dudat ago
Even rat poison is 99% good food.
I also say "good observations and diagnosis, terrible prescriptions", regarding controlled opposition. They say things that get you to think they are on our side "oh look how they talk about white men being attacked" ... But their solution is just leading one to the same path we've been on.
thisistotallynotme ago
Roger Stone is Alex Jones' handler. Has been since he was Hicks.
septimasexta ago
Do you have sources for that?
thisistotallynotme ago
Yes, but to ask such a question means you're not paying much attention.
Shizy ago
So that sounds like a NO 😂
septimasexta ago
Then, could you post them? I wrote Stone off a while ago, and became especially suspicious when he appeared on InfoWars. I didn't consider that he was Alex' handler.
lovely1 ago
its them moving their censorship timeline up...infowars is just testing waters
300_Black ago
False outrage (which is the cornerstone of MSM); also the "forbidden fruit" effect makes normies think Infowars might be truthful (it isn't)
IIJOSEPHXII ago
This is the basis of "red pills"
telleveryoneyouknow ago
Spot on