Its easy for Are We Sure to eat people's lunch when there are no facts or people jump to conclusions with no evidence. Why do you think Are We Sure switched from trolling this place to trolling the Q sub? Because the Q sub is easy pickings and its easy for Are We Sure to be more accurate than the Q followers. This ain't rocket science.

For the first time on Voat after a year of being accussed of being paid to do this or working for the Rothschilds or David Brock or Soros, I have the feeling "Someone's on to me." Congratulations.

What can I say, the bad logic migrated and I follow the bad logic. I mean this is amazingly bad logic

The fact that you and AWS miraculously emerge every time someone posts one of these capstone exercises, exposing it to be another false flag with pedophile ties pretty much says everything right there.

It's like I have some superpower. Somebody will jam a round current event into the square hole of their mind and when I point out they don't actually fit, I've exposed it as a false flag. Imagine that, evidence that it's not what they claim, is proof IT'S EXACTLY what they claim.

It's almost if a graduate student doing research into the idea that those prone Conspiracist Ideation will not only reject valid opposing evidence, they will claim that valid opposing evidence reaffirms their beliefs.

Or as Stephan Lewandowsky found in his article, The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science, "any evidence against a conspiracy theory is reinterpreted as evidence in favour of it."