no, it doesnt by the fucking definition of the god damn word.
if you have hit puberty but are still not grown that is a different mental thing than pedos, it is
Ephebophilia which is an attraction to post or mid pubescent young adults.
these are important to differentiate in our language or the fucking government will start jailing teenagers who fuck as pedos and if you dont think that will happen IT ALREADY DOES and they get charged with child porn for taking pictures of their own 17yo tits etc.
Language fucking matters with this shit. Use the right words.
By the definition of the law, if you are under the age of consent, you are guilty of pedophilia. By the definition of the word, still in this case, it very well can be considered pedophilia. We're you there did you look at the state of the young boys development? 13 is certainly my an age where most children are not fully sexually developed. Not to mention the first definition I find simply says "child" and doesn't go I to all this trying to explain bullshit you are. A child is considered anyone under 18 by law. You can try and justify your own feelings, doesn't mean others are going to agree with you man.
I would say that arguing semantics when morals are the same isn't something needed here. The fact is if a child is under the age of consent it is rape. Is it worse if a child is under say 10? Maybe so, but for the sake of our discussion you're still a slimeball. Your insistance on making sure that the correct pedo terms are use make you yourself suspect. It's all illegal and all immoral, so call it what you want, doesn't change that.
you dont get the point, at all, this has nothing to do with feelings and there are no room for feelings.
the law doesnt give a fuck. right now a 17 year old can be charged for child porn for taking a picture of their own tits and be a registered sex offender for the rest of their life.
this is because of shitty wording in laws.
if ANYBODY THINKS THAT IS OK YOU ARE THE ENEMY AND CAN FUCK OFF.
There are no known cases involving federal charges against a minor for child porn. There have been charges in local cases, however since those are juvenile court and the records are sealed, we wouldn't be privy to their outcome, but one could guess that they got probation or community service. Now, sure you can work to change the local laws, but why? Please do cite one time where a child was prosecuted and received unfair punishment for such a "crime." And the reason for these laws is clear of course they don't want these "selfies" ending up for sell by adults to adult viewers of child pornography. So I'm not quite sure what you motive is here. What exactly is your point, and do provide an instance of said happenings where some child was sentenced to an unfair or excessive punishment. Otherwise your motive.... Is?
you got way too much wound up in this. you want to use pedo as a slander word instead of a definition and are willing to go the if you disagree you are a pedo argument.
fuckin dipshit. go larp somewhere else. dont breed.
Bwahahaha I provide actual facts and your entire argument crumbles and you resort to more attacks. Because yeah facts don't matter to you unless they fit your lame argument. Again provide an actual instance of what you claim happening and a child getting unfair punishment or CLEARLY you're the LARP... By definition...
That's quite the stretch. And he will probably get off. But it doesn't satisfy a minor being prosecuted. I do agree it's bullshit. I doubt they could get a conviction though. A good lawyer could stomp that case out of court.
view the rest of the comments →
Neinlife ago
USE THE CORRECT LANGUAGE OR SHUT THE FUCK UP. THAT IS NOT WHAT PEDO MEANS.
Fateswebb ago
Technically it does dude.
Neinlife ago
no, it doesnt by the fucking definition of the god damn word. if you have hit puberty but are still not grown that is a different mental thing than pedos, it is Ephebophilia which is an attraction to post or mid pubescent young adults.
these are important to differentiate in our language or the fucking government will start jailing teenagers who fuck as pedos and if you dont think that will happen IT ALREADY DOES and they get charged with child porn for taking pictures of their own 17yo tits etc.
Language fucking matters with this shit. Use the right words.
Fateswebb ago
By the definition of the law, if you are under the age of consent, you are guilty of pedophilia. By the definition of the word, still in this case, it very well can be considered pedophilia. We're you there did you look at the state of the young boys development? 13 is certainly my an age where most children are not fully sexually developed. Not to mention the first definition I find simply says "child" and doesn't go I to all this trying to explain bullshit you are. A child is considered anyone under 18 by law. You can try and justify your own feelings, doesn't mean others are going to agree with you man.
Neinlife ago
has nothing to do with feelings. has to do with using the proper language.
you fucking idiots think anyone smarter than you must be wrong.
Fateswebb ago
When you meet someone smarter than me let me know. Until then people are gonna continue to call you out on your pedo sympathy bullshit.
Neinlife ago
knowing the english language and pedo sympathy are not the samd thing.
i could throw a penny into a crowd of somalians and it would hit 3 people smarter than you.
the ONLY argument any of you retards submit is "you arent using it wrong like we are so you are also a pedo" cnn has more integrity than u
Fateswebb ago
I would say that arguing semantics when morals are the same isn't something needed here. The fact is if a child is under the age of consent it is rape. Is it worse if a child is under say 10? Maybe so, but for the sake of our discussion you're still a slimeball. Your insistance on making sure that the correct pedo terms are use make you yourself suspect. It's all illegal and all immoral, so call it what you want, doesn't change that.
Neinlife ago
you dont get the point, at all, this has nothing to do with feelings and there are no room for feelings.
the law doesnt give a fuck. right now a 17 year old can be charged for child porn for taking a picture of their own tits and be a registered sex offender for the rest of their life.
this is because of shitty wording in laws.
if ANYBODY THINKS THAT IS OK YOU ARE THE ENEMY AND CAN FUCK OFF.
Fateswebb ago
There are no known cases involving federal charges against a minor for child porn. There have been charges in local cases, however since those are juvenile court and the records are sealed, we wouldn't be privy to their outcome, but one could guess that they got probation or community service. Now, sure you can work to change the local laws, but why? Please do cite one time where a child was prosecuted and received unfair punishment for such a "crime." And the reason for these laws is clear of course they don't want these "selfies" ending up for sell by adults to adult viewers of child pornography. So I'm not quite sure what you motive is here. What exactly is your point, and do provide an instance of said happenings where some child was sentenced to an unfair or excessive punishment. Otherwise your motive.... Is?
Neinlife ago
you got way too much wound up in this. you want to use pedo as a slander word instead of a definition and are willing to go the if you disagree you are a pedo argument.
fuckin dipshit. go larp somewhere else. dont breed.
Fateswebb ago
Bwahahaha I provide actual facts and your entire argument crumbles and you resort to more attacks. Because yeah facts don't matter to you unless they fit your lame argument. Again provide an actual instance of what you claim happening and a child getting unfair punishment or CLEARLY you're the LARP... By definition...
Neinlife ago
fuckin freak idiot.
Fateswebb ago
😂 point proven
Neinlife ago
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180706/16313340187/fbi-decides-to-ruin-mans-life-over-nude-photos-his-legal-girlfriend-he-took-seven-years-ago.shtml
Fateswebb ago
That's quite the stretch. And he will probably get off. But it doesn't satisfy a minor being prosecuted. I do agree it's bullshit. I doubt they could get a conviction though. A good lawyer could stomp that case out of court.
Neinlife ago
it shouldnt even be a trial. language is important. this is happening a lot.
Neinlife ago
you never had one. you never will.