Link To Blog Article
An Open Secret Tweet
Yesterday, the 'An Open Secret' twitter page reshared a youtube clip from the Argentinian movie, calling out Netflix for distributing child porn, that Netflix offers called Desire. It is upsetting subscribers because of what looks like illegal content. An Open Secret turned the clip into the FBI and the next day it's under investigation. Viewers on Facebook have shared a clip of the movie and are calling it outright child porn. In the opening scene, two little girls who look to be about seven and nine are playing "horse" on pillows. The older girl begins to obviously masturbate as the younger child watches. The camera even takes this scene into a closeup of the child's face in slow motion, moving up and down and panting like a porn star. The scene is graphic and includes an orgasm. The film is directed by Diego Kaplan.
PJ Media reported it to the FBI and the Department of Justice at the same time as others, along with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which has launched an investigation.
The clip is making its way around Facebook, but anyone sharing it should be aware that it is a crime to circulate child porn, even if you are trying to get help for the child. Any further distribution revictimizes the child, and because of that, PJM will not share the video or photos from the movie that show the victims' faces. The only thing the public can do is report it to the authorities.
According to the Department of Justice, child porn is clearly defined.
Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. An undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.
Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.
On this definition alone Netflix is in violation of distributing child pornography because the child in question is very clearly engaging in the sexual act of masturbation and this exceeds the minimum requirement of merely being suggestive. Netflix should be in serious trouble over this. The law further states that the law "prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child pornography using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce."
Netflix is now distributing child porn for profit. This is not surprising to anyone who read my expose on Netflix's original series, Big Mouth, which is nothing but a cartoon that grooms kids for child abuse. It is a hideous and outrageous piece of garbage that includes talking genitalia of children, children telling jokes about blow jobs, and constant, unending masturbation. The obvious next step for Netflix is real-life children engaging in sexual activity. The question must be asked. How low can the entertainment industry go? And what kind of parents took money for their child to be used in this way?
view the rest of the comments →
carmencita ago
After allowing B & MO to jump on, we should not be surprised. This is a new day at Netflix. Expect to see more sneaky slipping in of CP and pedo norm.
dreamdigital ago
B and MO? Sorry, it's not registering in my brain what that is.
carmencita ago
Barack and Michelle O. They just recently joined with Netflix. The beginning of even a more downward spiral.
Cleanhobo ago
Michael Lavon Robinson... Football player at a college in Eugene Oregon, first "lady".
Psalm100 ago
Michael Robinson has to be a very, very common name, and I just don't believe that. There is some evidence that Obama might have been born to his mother while she was visiting Kenya, but the idea that Michelle might be a man I believe is just plain wrong. African-ancestry women tend on average to have more muscle than European-ancestry women, and I believe that's entirely the matter.
Cleanhobo ago
Ohhhhhh sweet child-o-summer. http://www.mydailyinformer.com/%E2%98%85michelle-obama-is-michael-lavaughn-robinson-shockingly-barry-calls-his-wife-michael-not-michelle/ You need to do some more investigation... https://i.pinimg.com/736x/22/4a/be/224abeb8ab371708a4fab74923092b25.jpg Where are the pictures of them with their children... Not the children as teens BUT AS BABIES... everyone takes pictures with their babies right? Thats what did it for me. ZERO baby pictures. Oh, and have you watched the hour long video of Sherriff Arpaio from Arizona dissecting that faked birth certificate? They even found the person's birth certificate that was used to generate the fake. Your comment that "there is some evidence" means you have not looked into this. Don't take my word for it! look into the what the actual investigators have been up to... Quite literally These people (Barry Sowetoro, his real name) illegally took the highest office of the land brought in a MAN as the first "Lady". They did it to shame us and throw it in our faces since they see us as sheep. They LITERALLY call us "The Cattle". One more question... Who is Qanon? https://hooktube.com/watch?v=6cYZ8dUgPuU
Psalm100 ago
I don't know if there are baby pictures out there or not, but I still see no credible evidence that Michelle is actually a man, and plenty visually and from her voice that she isn't. I have seen that photo before, but that could easily be photoshopped and without more definitive evidence, like official video showing that moment, then I have to think it is.
"Your comment that "there is some evidence" means you have not looked into this."
Well, it might mean that, but it doesn't. I did look into it very deeply...ten years ago during the Presidential race. I read the analyses of a guy with some graphics expertise who also researched different birth certificate forms from Hawaii, and he kept pointing out how Obama's documents were likely fake. I followed WorldNetDaily's extensive coverage of every aspect of the story, including laws on citizenship of that time, and studied things like the Hawaii newspaper birth announcement, the confusion over what Oahu hospital he was supposedly born in, that information sheet or whatever from years ago which said he was from Kenya, and on and on. And yes, I also watched that video that Joe Arpaio did and believed that that BC was likely someone else's made to look like his. I hope the truth on that one day comes out, but I don't know if it ever will in this world. On Michelle, though, I still so no evidence that she's not a real woman.
Cleanhobo ago
It's a man baby.... Everyone in the know knows... Plus you never answered my questions!