You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

Hi,

This is pretty ridiculous.

Armancio Ortega is 82 years old. He announced his retirement in 2011 as the link you used showed in its very first sentence.

So let's look at the sequence.

2011 74-year old Ortega announces his retirement and names his successor.

2017 81 year old Ortega retires.

That's it that's the sequence. None of this was affected by any American.

he's doing pretty bad, financially

Do you ever read what you link to ? I hope I do so financially bad one day.

Ortega's net worth fell in lockstep, declining 6% to $68 billion

So this theory about Ortega is just silly.

But it gets flat out ridiculous when you apply it to Melania's message.

So her message about human trafficking, is "I REALLY DON'T CARE, DO U?"

OMG. I just clicked on the PIZZAGATE Pictures. This is flat out lunacy.

The "numerous Pizzagate looking pictures" are because ZARA sell clothes. They sell clothes to adults and to children and these pictures are pictures of kid wearing those clothes and there's nothing sexual about it at all. And if you think these pictures are sexual, there's something off with you.

Wow.

Mammy ago

Yea, on points 1 & 2 you are right to be skeptical, and I agree "he's doing pretty bad financially" is poor phrasing given the context. In fact, I had similar thoughts.

But when you consider Melanie Trump's history as a fashion model and her impeccable taste in clothing, for her to wear a $39 jacket to visit a holding facility for immigrant children, (the majority of whom are known to be trafficked by coyotes) with THOSE particular words emblazoned on the jacket (printed by the company, incidentally), it is not too big of a stretch to ponder a symbolic or coded meaning intended for a specific audience.

Then to discover the company who made the clothing has a history of operating sweat shops, it is not without reason to say there is enough potential link for further research. (Hence the word, "potential," twice in the heading.)

As for the pics, I don't find them especially alarming, either -- they just seem to have a focus on the kids more so than the clothes, but meh, waddiknow about today's kids' fashion marketing strategy?

So if you're not sure yet, that's okay. I'm not entirely, either. Nevertheless, interest is piqued. Dig or don't; fine by me.

Immelda ago

When i saw the words on the coat and how much it cost i had a fleeting thought of how thoughtful, she isn't going in there with a $25k christian dior gown on and a shit ton of diamonds and then i thought well most of the kids might not understand it because can they read English yet?