Note that "Crimes Against Children" is mentioned SEPERATELY from sexting.
This is proof that resident shill Are We Sure and his buddy KnightsOfHubris are liars. The Anthony Weiner Laptop really does have incriminating shit on it. Be sure to endlessly taunt them about it.
But your ASSUMING just as much or EVEN MORE THAN anyone else here. Right before the crime against children it says Clinton foundation, Anthony weiners was well before that and that point was already finished. Why would he say Anthony weiner, then mention a crime against a child, then move on and say Clinton foundation, then go back and reiterate with an additional note crime against children? That makes no fucking sense. You're stretching even further while telling others they're stretching. This is where you're are we sure name is exposed as a fraud, because you're not sure..... You're grasping even harder than others are. There's a natural flow to the notes, and right before this is Clinton foundation. WHY? when you're taking notes why would you move on from weiner to his crime against a child on to the Clinton foundation then back to point 2 that you already wrote in detail? Dude it doesn't make sense so go ahead and pretzel some more.
No. I'm not assuming anything. I'm basing this on the fact that Athony Weiner plead guility to a crime involving a single girl and and after reviewing these emails, the FBI closed the Clinton case again. People who are clinging to the Weiner laptop will put Hillary Clinton in jail are not evern grasping at straws, they are grasping at the dust the straws have turned into since they first grasped at straws.
There is nothing in the IG Report that supporters the pizzagaters claims. Zero.
In fact you should read the entire chapter on this. This nitpicking over a quickly written note that has a completely plausible other explanation is an incredibly slender reed to base a claim on. There's no way to read that full chapter and think the Weiner-laptop-hoax story stands up. For one, it's mentioned over and over and over again, that the FBI does not have a warrant to look at the Clinton material and thus are not looking at that material until they get one. At the time the note was written they were not looking and Clinton's email and in fact they guidance they were given was not even to look at emails between Weiner and his wife.....sexting with his wife would not be a crime. Only emails between Weiner and other people were to be reviewed.
Anthony weiners was well before that and that point was already finished.
This a complete assumption here. These are quick notes not a detailed write up. It's far fetched to think that point was already finished. Notes are created with chronologically....you write notes as the information is said.....later on you put it full order and add details. (Actually one of the things I do for a living is writing up clear notes that make sure all important agreements are understood by everyone who was there.) And the evidence leans towards your assumption being a false assumption. Because wrote down 3 numbered points with details under #3 #1 is Athony Weiner and #3 is details about the Weiner case. So no, the Weiner thing was not done.
I'm not assuming anything. I just think we should be sure, and not close the case without investigating every angle. But what's very telling is, you're ignoring that the FBI lied about every single point they made when closing the case. And that if the job is done correctly now it will be reopened. They literally came on the air. And admitted Clinton was guilty of several things and then said no charges will be filed. That certainly doesn't help your explanation at all. So you're saying that they even lied internally? It just doesn't make any sense and certainly not enough sense to claim that you're sure.
But what's very telling is, you're ignoring that the FBI lied about every single point they made when closing the case
Look if you are going to just make shit up, why bother discussing the IG report at all.
They told the truth and you simply don't like what the truth is. And the IG report now confirms this. No one has ever been charged with a crime for doing the things Clinton did. The IG report discussed this in detail and concludes it was the proper decision.
The stuff Clinton did is usually handled within the agency, not prosecuting as a crime.
view the rest of the comments →
darkknight111 ago
Note that "Crimes Against Children" is mentioned SEPERATELY from sexting.
This is proof that resident shill Are We Sure and his buddy KnightsOfHubris are liars. The Anthony Weiner Laptop really does have incriminating shit on it. Be sure to endlessly taunt them about it.
Are_we_sure ago
https://media.tenor.com/images/22d9689453caf1cd8e4da60495038966/tenor.gif
You're delusional. And you can't even get a three word quote correct. Are you just incompetent or being dishonest again?
dtneslo ago
Are you saying crime instead of crimes? Why wouldnt crime against children also be damning...there is nothing funny about any of this
Are_we__sure ago
It's damning for Anthony Weiner. Because that is who it refers to.
And they were investigating him for his dealings with a single girl.
Fateswebb ago
But your ASSUMING just as much or EVEN MORE THAN anyone else here. Right before the crime against children it says Clinton foundation, Anthony weiners was well before that and that point was already finished. Why would he say Anthony weiner, then mention a crime against a child, then move on and say Clinton foundation, then go back and reiterate with an additional note crime against children? That makes no fucking sense. You're stretching even further while telling others they're stretching. This is where you're are we sure name is exposed as a fraud, because you're not sure..... You're grasping even harder than others are. There's a natural flow to the notes, and right before this is Clinton foundation. WHY? when you're taking notes why would you move on from weiner to his crime against a child on to the Clinton foundation then back to point 2 that you already wrote in detail? Dude it doesn't make sense so go ahead and pretzel some more.
Are_we__sure ago
No. I'm not assuming anything. I'm basing this on the fact that Athony Weiner plead guility to a crime involving a single girl and and after reviewing these emails, the FBI closed the Clinton case again. People who are clinging to the Weiner laptop will put Hillary Clinton in jail are not evern grasping at straws, they are grasping at the dust the straws have turned into since they first grasped at straws.
There is nothing in the IG Report that supporters the pizzagaters claims. Zero.
In fact you should read the entire chapter on this. This nitpicking over a quickly written note that has a completely plausible other explanation is an incredibly slender reed to base a claim on. There's no way to read that full chapter and think the Weiner-laptop-hoax story stands up. For one, it's mentioned over and over and over again, that the FBI does not have a warrant to look at the Clinton material and thus are not looking at that material until they get one. At the time the note was written they were not looking and Clinton's email and in fact they guidance they were given was not even to look at emails between Weiner and his wife.....sexting with his wife would not be a crime. Only emails between Weiner and other people were to be reviewed.
This a complete assumption here. These are quick notes not a detailed write up. It's far fetched to think that point was already finished. Notes are created with chronologically....you write notes as the information is said.....later on you put it full order and add details. (Actually one of the things I do for a living is writing up clear notes that make sure all important agreements are understood by everyone who was there.) And the evidence leans towards your assumption being a false assumption. Because wrote down 3 numbered points with details under #3 #1 is Athony Weiner and #3 is details about the Weiner case. So no, the Weiner thing was not done.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DfrcbIPVAAAeV2F.jpg
If you read the notes chronologically, you came come up with a plausible chronology.
1 We up on the Weiner sexting case? Yes. blah blah blah
2 What about this unrelated case? blah blah blah
3 Give me the Details with Weiner ?
Weiner case is about sexting with underage teenager.
We served the search warrant and got his laptop.
Found a bunch of emails. Some are Clinton's. Now we have a Clinton case and a Weiner case and we don't have a search warrant for the Clinton material.
That plausible scenario is informed by the full chapter seven.
Fateswebb ago
I'm not assuming anything. I just think we should be sure, and not close the case without investigating every angle. But what's very telling is, you're ignoring that the FBI lied about every single point they made when closing the case. And that if the job is done correctly now it will be reopened. They literally came on the air. And admitted Clinton was guilty of several things and then said no charges will be filed. That certainly doesn't help your explanation at all. So you're saying that they even lied internally? It just doesn't make any sense and certainly not enough sense to claim that you're sure.
Are_we__sure ago
Look if you are going to just make shit up, why bother discussing the IG report at all.
They told the truth and you simply don't like what the truth is. And the IG report now confirms this. No one has ever been charged with a crime for doing the things Clinton did. The IG report discussed this in detail and concludes it was the proper decision.
The stuff Clinton did is usually handled within the agency, not prosecuting as a crime.