You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

This all utter bullshit. This was brought during her confirmation hearings and explained. She wrote an article about using gender neutral language when writing laws. She did not take a position one way or the other on the age of consent. She was not writing at all about the age of consent. When asked directly during her confirmation she said she had no problems with the existing age of consent laws.

What she did argue is that by not making the language of some laws gender neutral, you could read the law to say men or even boys could never be raped.

TL/DR She was absolutely correct and enemies of her confirmation tried to distort what she wrote.

shillcrusher13 ago

Still rushing to the defense of your beloved pedo sympathizers, I see.