Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources.
Please explain how your post relates to pizzagate and please explain what led to your question and provide sources. The linked article also does not contain anything Pizzagate specific and the mere mention of Scalise is not adequate to meet the rules as the article does not directly reference sexual abuse by the elite. People that do not know Scalise's history would never understand how this relates to Pizzagate.
Thank you!
(deletes a thread of an old lady trying to explain why Talmudists rape children, using rule 2, and then posts this thread, breaking Rule 2)
How many pages of submissions do you need to see before something is common knowledge, ES? Your distaste for anything that encourages pizzagoats is showing. 😏
How many pages of submissions do you need to see before something is common knowledge, ES? Your distaste for anything that encourages pizzagoats is showing. 😏
The great thing about debating someone with an overblown ego is the fact the person with the big ego is the only one that doesn't know he was wrong before the debate even began :) Its almost sinful.
When did this happen and how many times have they called you a shill so far for just enforcing the rules? 😌
More than I can remember. Every time I have called him out for harassing threads about Zionism, Jesuits, Jews, Freemasons, or Trump's ties to pedophiles he gets all catty and calls me a shill. Its a routine affair. :)
view the rest of the comments →
ESOTERICshade ago
Rule 2: Empiricism
Please explain how your post relates to pizzagate and please explain what led to your question and provide sources. The linked article also does not contain anything Pizzagate specific and the mere mention of Scalise is not adequate to meet the rules as the article does not directly reference sexual abuse by the elite. People that do not know Scalise's history would never understand how this relates to Pizzagate.
Thank you!
(deletes a thread of an old lady trying to explain why Talmudists rape children, using rule 2, and then posts this thread, breaking Rule 2)
Vindicator ago
(((that is not common knowledge)))
How many pages of submissions do you need to see before something is common knowledge, ES? Your distaste for anything that encourages pizzagoats is showing. 😏
ESOTERICshade ago
The great thing about debating someone with an overblown ego is the fact the person with the big ego is the only one that doesn't know he was wrong before the debate even began :) Its almost sinful.
eucalyptus_spearmint ago
Oh lawdy. You're a mood now? When did this happen and how many times have they called you a shill so far for just enforcing the rules? 😌
ESOTERICshade ago
More than I can remember. Every time I have called him out for harassing threads about Zionism, Jesuits, Jews, Freemasons, or Trump's ties to pedophiles he gets all catty and calls me a shill. Its a routine affair. :)