You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@MigratoryPatterns, I am giving this an "Accuracy in Question" flair. This post is 99% speculation -- you aren't providing research to an audience you respect to judge for themselves, you are spewing your own enraged interpretation of Sawyer's statements and Crokin's tweets and ramming it down people's throats. I don't know if you are trying to help them by smearing them, or just lack self-control, but this Reddit-style thread does not help the argument you are trying to push.

Only a couple of lines in this diatribe contain any research/facts. And you completely ignore the possibility that both Sawyer and Crokin are just as capable of being snared by disinfo as any of us; especially regarding all the recent news which the majority of users here are questioning and requestioning. You should be aware that your name-calling, jumping to conclusions and vitriol make this piece look like the kind of smear-job we usually see from shills. It's not effective.

IVIVI ago

Its hard to keep up with all the new incoming information and people involved with this pedo shit. Threads like this one make it even harder when someone claims "CONFIRMED", but really hasn't confirmed anything, but their bias.

Situations may look one way, but that doesn't mean the guy is a CONFIRMED disinfo agent aiding the PEDOs. Its almost as if everyone in the spot light is a shill for the pedos.

The people in the spot light are doing more for the movement than this poster and threads like them. A bunch of outsiders, looking in, thinking they know it all, with mostly just personal opinions and feelings on situations that COULD be shady, but its not CONFIRMED.

This thread is more disinfo than Craig Sawyer.

Thank you Vindicator.