You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

In a letter to the UN, d'Adesky said she met Silsby in January 2010, a day or so before Silsby's arrest, in a hotel in the Dominican Republic.

There's already a thread up on this story. d'Adesky met Silsby on Jan 24th in the Dominican Republic. Silsby was arrested on Jan 29th.

Yeah, right. d'Adesky the Savior. Her family owns one of the biggest shipping companies in Haiti, DACO d'Adesky Import Export S.A.

This is completely illogical and evidence of nothing. All you have indicating is you are suspicious. You indicate no guilty whatsoever on d'Adesky's part.

Did the earthquake interrupt an op? The trafficking must have been underway when Silsby was caught in the quake.

Absolutely not. How you can write up a lenghty post like this be completely ignorant of the basic facts? The quake hit on January 12th, here are headlines from January 14th. Silsby was in Idaho when the quake hit.

https://www.snd.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/USAT_globe.jpg

Your post gets even worse

She needed a Plan B and was put in touch with d'Adesky. Bingo! Ships! And, cargo containers can be shipped through ports with "diplomatic immunity." They are not allowed to be opened, detained, or x-rayed.

Nice imagination, but Silsby was caught with a bunch of kids on a bus. Their plan didn't involve ships. They were going to drive over the Haitian border in a bus.

And, cargo containers can be shipped through ports with "diplomatic immunity."

Lunacy. We've reached lunacy. Silsby was a screwup. She couldn't even print up fake Haitian papers. Now she's going to navigate diplomatic immunity? Cargo containers do not get diplomatic immunity.

diplomatic cargo is fully subject to inspection

This is the diplomatic pouch you are thinking of here.

They are not allowed to be opened, detained, or x-rayed.

d'Adesky had not reason to come forward and connect herself to Silsby, but she did. And when she did she undermined Silsby's story that she was not aware she would need sign off from Haitian authorities. d'Adesky was clearing point out she knew the rules and was flauting them. d'Adesky wrote quite critically of Silsby before any pizzagater ever did.

NCMEC also has connections with Laura Silsby. NCMEC is in charge of the Amber Alert Program and Silsby works on their Executive Team.

This is a bit mixed up. The NCMEC is not "in charge" of the Amber Alert System. The Amber Alert system is coordinated by the Department of Justice. The Amber Alerts is administered by local law enforcement.
NCMEC cannot issue an alert. It administer the tipline and resource clearinghouse for missing children, but it is not in charge of the Amber Alert System.

Alert Sense sells the equipment, for this system. It does not administer the Amber Alert System. Alert Sense is a vendor, they have no authority to do anything about the Alert System themselves. The IRS buys its calculators and spreadsheet software from vendors. The vendors have no control over your taxes.

And of course, there's no connection of the Clintons to Silsby.

13Buddha ago

I appreciate your comments, but your dissection is rather harsh. This is not Journalism 101 here. Many of us try to do a good job on this sub, and I am one of them. The Haiti connection, as well as many other pizzagate rabbit holes are deep and vast. Hypotheticals are not forbidden here. Additionally, you are putting words into my mouth with a few of your comments. 1+1 equalling 2 does not always happen here. I believed the neonrevolt link contained good info, and info pushes many of us to dig deeper.

I appreciate and welcome criticism when it's constructive. I appreciate and welcome comments that expand on a post and/or correct contents of it. As I mentioned in the first paragraphs, all of the info came from the neonrevolt link and their links (which were numerous) that were cited in their article.

Are_we_sure ago

My dissection is harsh because you bought into many falsehoods and are intent on pushing new ones. You're defaming a woman who publically came out against Silsby based on nothing but your own suspicion and the fact you have already swallowed several falsehoods.

Your casual defamation belies your claim to want to do a good job.

think- ago

Don't worry. He always tries to undermine investigations. That's his job. :-)

Are_we_sure ago

You should try to engage my evidence and my arguments if you're going to be moderator and not push lies about me.