You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

cutelobster ago

The Q-project was fake, no doubt. The question is do we believe the current narrative of how Q was faked. All of the current stories tend to move Q away from alphabet agency control. Is Q really not the CIA (or one of the umpteen other government agencies?) The current narrative gives us Q as a creation of a few private individuals or private organisations. It seems suspicious when we start to have 'colourful characters' (some with 'colourful names'- Baruch the Scribe!) getting pushed our way. Did Q really arise from the soup of a low-rent soap-opera?There were large resources behind the project - where did the money come from? Why did Youtube green-light and push the project? Could Q really gain such traction without at least the tacit approval of the intelligence community? Like JFK and 911, I guess we will never know. But if the creation of Q was a psyop of some kind, then the same could go for the deconstruction of Q.

think- ago

The question is do we believe the current narrative of how Q was faked.

But if the creation of Q was a psyop of some kind, then the same could go for the deconstruction of Q.

This.

SoberSecondThought ago

Oddly enough, we agree. The deconstruction of Q is also a psyop.