Steemit: https://steemit.com/q/@ridleychozo/6-irl-damages-of-false-prophet-q-anon
YT: https://youtu.be/RNSVrrakF6A
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/xy7dZ9eQ9do0/
With all the blatant elite corruption being more exposed to the public than ever before in history, the people desperately needed a hero – and they got ‘Q anon’.
As more people are waking up to the fact that ‘Q anon’ is a mountain of lies, a lot of people are dismissing the whole thing to say “oh well, what harm?"
I will tell you what harm.
A major pizzagate researcher, FLYNNL1VE5, was likely shot because of 'Q' and the pizzagate investigation in general was stalled due to the research community's focus on Q's false aid.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@ridleychozo, I am flairing this Possible Disinfo because it makes a number of misleading or false claims, such as "Q anon is a mountain of lies" (not proven) and:
Which I know for a fact to be completely false causation. I spoke with Rebel shortly after Pizzagatewiki went offline and he confirmed it was due to his letting the registration lapse, which I posted about here. He is still around.
It's also pretty lame that you are blaming the consequences of hacking the Deepstate that FlynnL1ve5 has encountered on QAnon. Where's your hit piece on Wikileaks asserting Seth Rich shouldn't have leaked the DNC emails to them, under that logic?
ESOTERICshade ago
Pretty much the whole truth community has turned on the fraud Q Anon and is dedicated to stamping out that plague known as Q. Its funny watching you guys turn against people you once considered heros simply because they have had enough of the Q bullshit.
At what point do you muster up some balls and say "ooops" I might have been wrong? You are a mod here so stop jamming your prejudices down the forum's throat.
Your credibility is toast.
Vindicator ago
Who is "you guys" and what "heroes" are talking about?
The problems in this thread have nothing to do with my supposed prejudices, ES. Maybe if you could step away from yours for two seconds, you could see it is loaded with false correlations and misleading statements. Why would you want to support that? This piece doesn't help your anti-Q case at all because it's so poorly sourced and constructed.
ESOTERICshade ago
You are not the style monitor. The post meets the rules (the way they have been interpreted so far) and that is the only thing you are allowed to judge. You let shit slide all day as long as its dirt on democrats or good about Trump.