You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Factfinder2 ago

Great news and glad you stayed on it.

Btw, I don't believe the Jehovah's Witness bit in your post has to do with an accusation against Schneiderman. It's about a whistle-blowing ex-JW filing a complaint against JW officials for covering up crimes. The complaint was filed in the NY State AG's office.

migratorypatterns ago

Hey, thanks! Good words are always appreciated.

The complaint was filed in the NY State AG's office.

Well, that would directly involve Schneiderman if it was filed in the time he was AG.

Factfinder2 ago

wow. whatever.

migratorypatterns ago

What'd say?

Are you replying to me? Whatever I said, I wasn't trying to be rude. Sorry.

Factfinder2 ago

Well, okay. I don't get what you think the article was saying about Schneiderman. People typically file legal complaints in the attorney general's office. That's all the article was saying about the AG's office--that the complaint was filed there.

There doesn't seem to be a connection beyond that between Schneiderman and the complaint that was filed is all I was trying to point out. Not a big deal.

migratorypatterns ago

Understood.

But it is his discretion that is used in following up on said complaint. I know, I'll give you an example:

An actress is assaulted by a big-time movie producer/director. She goes to the LAPD and files a complaint. The LAPD determines there's no evidence that the sex was not consensual despite bruising, a hospital report, and two witnesses. Who would you say is responsible for the case not going forward?

Factfinder2 ago

The case was filed May 18 and there's no indication in the article that it's not being followed up on, but I say let's agree to disagree and move on. It's a mole hill.