You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

exposethecriminals ago

Really horrific stuff, the truth needs to come out about the children.

Buried in the complaint though, is a statement that Jane Doe 1 was an adult when "recruited":

Paragraph 42: https://kek.gg/i/43kWkB.png

 

As for Jane Doe 2, her age is conspicuously absent, however she did own a car. So, if she was 16 or 17, I think she would legally be considered a minor because there is a crime involved, but I'm not sure how the law works.

Paragraph 57: https://kek.gg/i/mbBR8.png

13Buddha ago

Damn, @exposethecriminals, I missed that. But it all makes sense. Maybe that is why the prosecution recently said new indictments were coming? With the statutes cited in the Complaint, I would think this is a possibility. @Pizzalawyer, need your comments. Also, is there any documentation that reveals how long Mack was involved with NXIVM? That could also substantiate or refute the ages of Jane Does' 1 and 2.

Are_we_sure ago

It seems that the 15 and 12 year olds were previous cases, right?

The defendant has a decades' long history of abusing women and girls. According to confidential sources, the defendant had repeated sexual encounters with multiple teenage girls in the mid-to-late 1980's and early 1990's.

cryptopancakes ago

That's a really good catch. And interesting theory. It actually seems like it could make a ton of sense. Have you seen Mack's last post on IG/Twitter? It's a little boy reciting some sort of new age mumbo jumbo and the poor thing looks like he's been abused with the circles around his eyes... :(