You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Hypercyberpastelgoth ago

FBI informant tries to ENTRAP Trump pre-investigation Shame on you for letting this slide in less than 24 hours. The Obama Administration tried to institute one party rule using the intelligence agencies and only failed by a margin of 100,000 votes. This is the biggest threat to our Republic. Ever.

The New York Times has essentially outed the CIA and FBI informant as Stefan Halper tonight in yet another lengthy justification article citing the reasoning from the perspective of the corrupt intelligence officers who conducted the surveillance and spying operation against the Trump campaign.

Two things to remember: First, they denied all of this for eighteen months. Second, these are their leaks, their story, their version; delivered via their spin, from the people who were conducting the scheme against the Trump campaign:

NYT: The informant, an American academic who teaches in Britain, made contact late that summer with one campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, according to people familiar with the matter. He also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page, who was also under F.B.I. scrutiny for his ties to Russia... they took steps, those officials said, to ensure that details of the inquiry were more closely held than even in a typical national security investigation, including the use of the informant to suss out information from the unsuspecting targets... The informant offered [to George Papadopoulos] a $3,000 honorarium for the paper and a paid trip to London, where the two could meet and discuss the research project. Mr. Papadopoulos replied that he had no insight into the Russian campaign — despite being told months earlier that the Russians had dirt on Mrs. Clinton in the form of thousands of her emails.

[Papadopoulos'] RESPONSE CLEARLY ANNOYED THE INFORMANT, WHO TRIED TO PRESS MR. PAPADOPOULOS ABOUT WHAT HE MIGHT KNOW

migratorypatterns ago

This.

Definitely, scummy all the way. But the biggest rebuttal to this narrative of the friendly-planted spy agents ''helping'' Trump will be the emails exchanged ... especially the ones between Strzok and Page. Remember that the rumor is some pretty unpleasant things were discussed re: Trump, and if there were a helpful vibe, some of the solutions proposed to the problem of Trump would not have been broached because there wouldn't have been a problem.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/16/strzok-page-texts-reveal-personal-relationship-between-fbi-official-and-judge-recused-from-flynn-case.html