The possession charges are all over but it's the making of the content that is the problem. And 50% of it is made in the U.S. (according to FBI) What the authorities are worried about is the "clear evidence of crimes" that comes from politicians and CEOs and other high profile people being seen in these videos. That's why the FBI imposes itself on all other countries with sharing networks, to suck up the proof of America's world leadership in this business and then "national security" is invoked to remove all traces of this from the record. So I am not that encouraged by arrests for possession. It probably means the person targetted possessed content that was problematic to important individuals (i.e. blackmail material).
view the rest of the comments →
EvaEverywhere ago
The possession charges are all over but it's the making of the content that is the problem. And 50% of it is made in the U.S. (according to FBI) What the authorities are worried about is the "clear evidence of crimes" that comes from politicians and CEOs and other high profile people being seen in these videos. That's why the FBI imposes itself on all other countries with sharing networks, to suck up the proof of America's world leadership in this business and then "national security" is invoked to remove all traces of this from the record. So I am not that encouraged by arrests for possession. It probably means the person targetted possessed content that was problematic to important individuals (i.e. blackmail material).