that's only a CLAIM, one we all swallowed in confirmation bias
do we have any evidence to SUBSTANTIATE the claim that isnt a derivative off 'What Eric Prince said' ??
do we even have evidence NYPD had it in their possession ? Because the evidence today from Honeybee is that the FBI warrant was to seize the laptop of GRANITE
if the NYPD had it, the FBI would not have needed to issue a warrant against Granite
(unless there were 2 separate laptops)
I am unaware of any source in the public arena of an NYPD member corroborating Eric Price's verbal claim (claim alone, Prince provided no document or image im aware of to back up his claim) that NYPD had Weiners laptop or other devices
but what we DO HAVE in a pretty high standard of evidence is the FBI warranting Granite for Weiners hardware, the Feds ran the case against Weiner til he pleaded guilty, so the Feds had the hardware all that time
so when in this chain of events did the NYPD have the opportunity to have Weiner's laptop? If you are to speculate that they had it, they HAD TO GIVE IT BACK to Weiner for him to then deliver it to Granite
and if THAT happened, it would suggest the NYPD were corrupt / compromised
so how are your standards of evidence? You have totally unsubstantiated claims, versus hard evidence that significantly reduces the likelihood of those unsubstantiated claims
it doesnt mean you have to be 100% conclusive that the NYPD never had it, it just suggests that you have a confirmation bias at work on your thinking process if you do not concede the greater likelihood that the NYPD never had the laptop
view the rest of the comments →
NoBS ago
The NYPD had living members who made no bones about seeing the evidence.
I take it all of them have been Seth Riched, well those who could not be blackmailed into silence.
MolochHunter ago
that's only a CLAIM, one we all swallowed in confirmation bias
do we have any evidence to SUBSTANTIATE the claim that isnt a derivative off 'What Eric Prince said' ?? do we even have evidence NYPD had it in their possession ? Because the evidence today from Honeybee is that the FBI warrant was to seize the laptop of GRANITE
if the NYPD had it, the FBI would not have needed to issue a warrant against Granite (unless there were 2 separate laptops)
NoBS ago
Seth Rick never claimed he was a Russian Hacker, your point?
Now if you would have told us that the Cops never COPY digital evidence to scan, well then, I'd be a liar in your eyes.
I can live with that.
MolochHunter ago
all things are possible
but im talking about Standards of Evidence
I am unaware of any source in the public arena of an NYPD member corroborating Eric Price's verbal claim (claim alone, Prince provided no document or image im aware of to back up his claim) that NYPD had Weiners laptop or other devices
but what we DO HAVE in a pretty high standard of evidence is the FBI warranting Granite for Weiners hardware, the Feds ran the case against Weiner til he pleaded guilty, so the Feds had the hardware all that time
so when in this chain of events did the NYPD have the opportunity to have Weiner's laptop? If you are to speculate that they had it, they HAD TO GIVE IT BACK to Weiner for him to then deliver it to Granite and if THAT happened, it would suggest the NYPD were corrupt / compromised
so how are your standards of evidence? You have totally unsubstantiated claims, versus hard evidence that significantly reduces the likelihood of those unsubstantiated claims
it doesnt mean you have to be 100% conclusive that the NYPD never had it, it just suggests that you have a confirmation bias at work on your thinking process if you do not concede the greater likelihood that the NYPD never had the laptop