Just came across these two Reddit posts from May 18:
"xolotl-tlaloc
edited 1 day ago
SS:
anthony weiner was (among other things) huma abadeen's husband;
it is rumored that weiner had a file called "life insurance" on his laptop;
it is speculated that Detective Miosotis Familia was murdered for having seen what was on the file.
trump was recently photographed kissing the hand of Detective Miosotis Familia's mom
... enjoy the show ;)"
I wish I had seen this post earlier so that my explanation below had reached Pizzagaters before they erroneously assumed we were going to see the "insurance" evidence itself. Should I have posted my comment as a reply instead of a comment after a long string of comments? Would upvotes move my comment upwards in the string of comments? I still know my rules of evidence from 40 years ago. As for computers, I'm woefully behind the times.
You did post as a reply, Pizzalawyer, and I saw it as soon as I logged in. I am changing the flair, as the title is inaccurate. My bad. :-( Comments don't become more visible with upvotes unless they are top-level (replying to the OP, not another commenter).
I wish I had happened upon this post earlier in the day. I could have explained what this was about before all of the string of comments. My comments are at the end of the line. .Should that explanation have been done as a reply instead of comment? Do upvotes move it towards the top? I just don''t want Pizzagaters to get the wrong impression, then yell and scream when we don't get to see the horrible evidence that Eric Prince claimed via hearsay was on the computer.
Have a hit of hopium.
Look at the credentials of Amanda Kramer, the US attorney listed on the unsealing order. Human trafficking and project safe childhood? That there is pizzagate in a nutshell.
Imagine being hired to do a job; better the lives of Americans. Especially the most vulnerable. Now imagine being stymied time and again by an administration that wants to give the illusion of maintaining law while enabling the worst of the worst.
Now imagine being given the opportunity to rain hell upon those who quashed investigations into human trafficking and child sexual exploitation.
QAnon said the pain was coming. Would the release of evidence from Weiner's laptop not qualify? Especially if related to "life insurance"? How does one get the truth out there as a mass redpill? By allowing evidence to be shown/known/reported upon. That way it's harder for the guilty parties to decry the info as being fraudulent-- due to the nature, forensic technology will be on our side.
That said, I'd expect a lot of false flag events to distract attention.
"QAnon said the pain was coming. Would the release of evidence from Weiner's laptop not qualify? Especially if related to "life insurance"? How does one get the truth out there as a mass redpill? By allowing evidence to be shown/known/reported upon. That way it's harder for the guilty parties to decry the info as being fraudulent-- due to the nature, forensic technology will be on our side.
This is absolutely correct. Furthermore it would illegal to release the contents of the laptop that are not used in a trial.
Think about it. Let's say the government goes after you for drug dealing and seizes your stuff. They can't release all those emails where you talk about how you hate your wife's sister or you think your boss is a jackass. It would be a massive invasion of privacy. They can't even release stuff they present to a grand jury, if the grand jury does not vote to indict you. All that is highly secret and it's illegal for anyone to leak grand jury evidence.
The idea that you are going to randomly being able to scroll through Anthony Weiner's stuff that's not part of his criminal case is not going to happen through legal channels.
This fantasy that other crimes are indicate on the laptop is a fantasy based on a deliberate hoax. Lies were deliberately told about what was on the laptop and everything since is evidence that they were lies.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
I'm going to go ahead and give this the "IMPORTANT!" flair. We've been waiting on this bit of news for a long, long time. :-)
septimasexta ago
Just came across these two Reddit posts from May 18:
"xolotl-tlaloc edited 1 day ago SS: anthony weiner was (among other things) huma abadeen's husband; it is rumored that weiner had a file called "life insurance" on his laptop; it is speculated that Detective Miosotis Familia was murdered for having seen what was on the file. trump was recently photographed kissing the hand of Detective Miosotis Familia's mom ... enjoy the show ;)"
"DontTreadOnMe16 1 day ago it is speculated that Detective Miosotis Familia was murdered for having seen what was on the file. Trump honors slain NYPD officer during DC memorial service Article is from yesterday. Coincidence?" https://nypost.com/2018/05/15/trump-honors-slain-nypd-officer-during-dc-memorial-service/
Narcissism ago
People who have access to that stuff should just get it out BEFORE they get whacked...
Pizzalawyer ago
I wish I had seen this post earlier so that my explanation below had reached Pizzagaters before they erroneously assumed we were going to see the "insurance" evidence itself. Should I have posted my comment as a reply instead of a comment after a long string of comments? Would upvotes move my comment upwards in the string of comments? I still know my rules of evidence from 40 years ago. As for computers, I'm woefully behind the times.
Vindicator ago
You did post as a reply, Pizzalawyer, and I saw it as soon as I logged in. I am changing the flair, as the title is inaccurate. My bad. :-( Comments don't become more visible with upvotes unless they are top-level (replying to the OP, not another commenter).
Pizzalawyer ago
thanks , my explanation at the meaning of the court order is 5.9 hours ago.
Pizzalawyer ago
I wish I had happened upon this post earlier in the day. I could have explained what this was about before all of the string of comments. My comments are at the end of the line. .Should that explanation have been done as a reply instead of comment? Do upvotes move it towards the top? I just don''t want Pizzagaters to get the wrong impression, then yell and scream when we don't get to see the horrible evidence that Eric Prince claimed via hearsay was on the computer.
Narcissism ago
Waiting too F@cking long to be more precise.
MolochHunter ago
premature, my man
the laptop's contents themselves have not been ordered released, only these official documents pertaining to the legal process
KnightsofHubris ago
warrant is unsealed and available to read https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2550145
duhiki ago
Have a hit of hopium. Look at the credentials of Amanda Kramer, the US attorney listed on the unsealing order. Human trafficking and project safe childhood? That there is pizzagate in a nutshell.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DdYUhsdU0AAMkdi.jpg
Imagine being hired to do a job; better the lives of Americans. Especially the most vulnerable. Now imagine being stymied time and again by an administration that wants to give the illusion of maintaining law while enabling the worst of the worst.
Now imagine being given the opportunity to rain hell upon those who quashed investigations into human trafficking and child sexual exploitation.
QAnon said the pain was coming. Would the release of evidence from Weiner's laptop not qualify? Especially if related to "life insurance"? How does one get the truth out there as a mass redpill? By allowing evidence to be shown/known/reported upon. That way it's harder for the guilty parties to decry the info as being fraudulent-- due to the nature, forensic technology will be on our side.
That said, I'd expect a lot of false flag events to distract attention.
septimasexta ago
"QAnon said the pain was coming. Would the release of evidence from Weiner's laptop not qualify? Especially if related to "life insurance"? How does one get the truth out there as a mass redpill? By allowing evidence to be shown/known/reported upon. That way it's harder for the guilty parties to decry the info as being fraudulent-- due to the nature, forensic technology will be on our side.
That said, I'd expect a lot of false flag events to distract attention." ARE TODAY'S EVENTS RELATED? https://nypost.com/2018/05/18/texas-high-school-shooting-suspect-identified/ http://www.ksla.com/story/38224686/plane-crashes-in-havana-cuba-100-on-board
septimasexta ago
HOME SCHOOL YOUR CHILDREN!
YogSoggoth ago
Photoshop until I see something attached to something. Q my ass.
Vindicator ago
You are right, Moloch. It's still important, but this headline is incorrect. Changing the flair.
Are_we__sure ago
This is absolutely correct. Furthermore it would illegal to release the contents of the laptop that are not used in a trial.
Think about it. Let's say the government goes after you for drug dealing and seizes your stuff. They can't release all those emails where you talk about how you hate your wife's sister or you think your boss is a jackass. It would be a massive invasion of privacy. They can't even release stuff they present to a grand jury, if the grand jury does not vote to indict you. All that is highly secret and it's illegal for anyone to leak grand jury evidence.
The idea that you are going to randomly being able to scroll through Anthony Weiner's stuff that's not part of his criminal case is not going to happen through legal channels.
This fantasy that other crimes are indicate on the laptop is a fantasy based on a deliberate hoax. Lies were deliberately told about what was on the laptop and everything since is evidence that they were lies.
ben_matlock ago
☝ That's what I'm seeing as well (unless the mysterious 'Attachment A' is the laptop.)
duhiki ago
Awesome!