So you basically have this happened and then this other thing happened and you are claiming without evidence that these two things that happened are connected.
It's basically a donut shop you don't like closed, but don't know why it closed.
The 'special donuts' all had names that were absolutely disgusting obvious pedoshit.PNG
This is ridiculous.
Voodoo Donuts in portland, FBI says likely child trafficking front a few months after POTUS won, VID FROM 2016:
Nope.
The video has nothing to do with VooDoo Donuts and the headline on the youtube post is false.
FBI Busts Club Connected to Voodoo Donuts for Child Prostitution
The video is a newsreport about a stripper was prostituting herself online. When cops investigated they found she was underage. The club said they didn't know this because she used a relative's ID to get her job stripping. The video says the club cooperated and was not "busted" at all. The club didn't even get shut down.
The club was not involved in her prostitution and the cops did bust the club for her being underage. And VooDoo donuts not mentioned at all.
There is a very good indication that the closing of the donuts shops in Kansas City and the busts for human trafficking are not connected at all.
The news about the donut shops just came out. As did the news about the human trafficking bust, but.....all the work in the human trafficking case wrapped up April 10th. It was just the news release went out this month. If this donut shop was involved, they would have been affected before this month.
THEREFORE, A caused B, is a type of argument you see over and over and over again on the internet and it's a false argument.
All it tells you is timing.
I even learned the Latin name for this argument.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
(Latin: "after this, therefore because of this") is a logical fallacy that states "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X." It is often shortened simply to post hoc fallacy.
It's a type of false cause fallacy, where the what causes an event is incorrectly identified. Another one of those I like is the Texas SharpShooter fallacy which is a way of cherry picking data once you know something has happened.
The name comes from a joke about a Texan who fires some gunshots at the side of a barn, then paints a target centered on the tightest cluster of hits and claims to be a sharpshooter.
It's giving meaning to data that can be completely random by only looking at small parts of that data. For example if someone make a ton of predictions, but you only focus on the predictions that seem true (Sound like anyone we know?), You might claim special insight, even foreknowledge for this person. But if you look at all his predictions, you would figure out he's wrong more than 90% of the time.
Data is a lot, lot easier to interpret in hindsight.
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we__sure ago
This is a whole buncha BS isn't it?
So you basically have this happened and then this other thing happened and you are claiming without evidence that these two things that happened are connected.
It's basically a donut shop you don't like closed, but don't know why it closed.
This is ridiculous.
Nope. The video has nothing to do with VooDoo Donuts and the headline on the youtube post is false.
The video is a newsreport about a stripper was prostituting herself online. When cops investigated they found she was underage. The club said they didn't know this because she used a relative's ID to get her job stripping. The video says the club cooperated and was not "busted" at all. The club didn't even get shut down.
The club was not involved in her prostitution and the cops did bust the club for her being underage. And VooDoo donuts not mentioned at all.
There is a very good indication that the closing of the donuts shops in Kansas City and the busts for human trafficking are not connected at all.
The news about the donut shops just came out. As did the news about the human trafficking bust, but.....all the work in the human trafficking case wrapped up April 10th. It was just the news release went out this month. If this donut shop was involved, they would have been affected before this month.
This article has more details on the donut shops in KC.Also here's what they put up
http://www.kansascity.com/latest-news/uelbd8/picture210864024/alternates/FREE_1140/doughnut%20lounge_3097f.jpg
That's not exactly the type of sign that goes up if your business has been seized by the government.
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
Sadly, I upvoted you. The tards are worse than the shills.
Are_we__sure ago
A happened.
Then B happened.
THEREFORE, A caused B, is a type of argument you see over and over and over again on the internet and it's a false argument.
All it tells you is timing.
I even learned the Latin name for this argument.
It's a type of false cause fallacy, where the what causes an event is incorrectly identified. Another one of those I like is the Texas SharpShooter fallacy which is a way of cherry picking data once you know something has happened.
It's giving meaning to data that can be completely random by only looking at small parts of that data. For example if someone make a ton of predictions, but you only focus on the predictions that seem true (Sound like anyone we know?), You might claim special insight, even foreknowledge for this person. But if you look at all his predictions, you would figure out he's wrong more than 90% of the time.
Data is a lot, lot easier to interpret in hindsight.
Pizzalawyer ago
thanks for the reality check. i too have made the same mistake now and then.
Are_we__sure ago
You're welcome. As a lawyer, I highly recommend you study logical fallacies. You will be able to spot when people are using them against you.
Sometimesineedhelp ago
I can't fathom why this comment is -5 right now, WTH???