You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@OhRutherfordBehave, please add some content explaining summarizing each of these links and why you're sharing them, per Rule 3:

EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post

I'm giving this the 24 Hour removal reprieve flair so you can edit. Reply to this comment when you've done so, and I will remove the flair.

OhRutherfordBehave ago

My post is an aggregate of relevant links so that researchers can all find them in one place. You got a fucking problem with that??? Nobody acts like this on any other subs you faggot.

DeathToMasonsASAP ago

You nailed it. They sandbag threads with damning info, and look for any loophole. That is why they created so many stipulations. Vindicator has been pulling this stunt since I have been here. Pedo pedo pedo mods.

OhRutherfordBehave ago

It used to be another guy doing the same shit. MillenniumFalcon. Literally the only sub on voat that does this shit, no other sub does anything close to this. You guys must be over target!

think- ago

@OhRutherfordBehave: The rules were made by the community. Many users here don't want to click on links, without knowing what the content is about.

Please add a short intro (2 or 3 sentences), and you can just copy the titles of the posts you collected, and add them.

The reason for 'no other sub does that' is that v/pizzagate is a research sub.

NoBS ago

The rules are a gift to pedophiles who pay the big bucks. Fuck off ya sick fucks.

think- ago

The rules were made by the community, since the sub was flooded with Hentai porn and shitposts when Pizzagate started here. Without rules the same would happen again. Use your brains....oh, you don't have any? What a pity.

NoBS ago

So you can remove the legitimate with the OBVIOUS spam? Censorship ripe for exploitation is why legitimate open debate is FUCKED.