You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@OhRutherfordBehave, please add some content explaining summarizing each of these links and why you're sharing them, per Rule 3:

EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post

I'm giving this the 24 Hour removal reprieve flair so you can edit. Reply to this comment when you've done so, and I will remove the flair.

OhRutherfordBehave ago

My post is an aggregate of relevant links so that researchers can all find them in one place. You got a fucking problem with that??? Nobody acts like this on any other subs you faggot.

Vindicator ago

Nobody acts like this on any other subs you faggot.

Other subs don't do what we do, ORB.

The community established the link description requirement because this is a research subverse. Posting links without context wastes people's time. It's also been an attack vector used by shills and trolls here many times in the past to expose subscribers to NSFW content. Since we have many child rape survivors here, the folks added this to our submission requirements, along with banning "Share-A-Link" posts, for similar reasons.

My post is an aggregate of relevant links so that researchers can all find them in one place.

I wish there were more roundup threads doing this, ORB. They are not very helpful, though, if they give no information about what is being linked and why.

NoBS ago

They know better than to protect pedophiles with censorship, you sick fuck.