Sexual abuse is bad but I'd like to know since when sexual abuse of multiple victims is considered "human trafficking" or "sex trafficking". It seems that they're just throwing that label onto any sex-related crime now. Using force, coercion, or imprisonment to get somebody to perform a sex act is horrible, but not the same as a shipping container packed with immigrants or forcing someone to work in a massage parlor for years to work off their debt to the mafia.
Sex trafficking does not mean they are being shipped in containers. It only means they are taken from one place to another for the purpose of sex. This being said I upvoated you because I believe I understand what you are saying and wholeheartedly agree. It is as if they are trying to say 'Look! We are arresting THE traffickers' when the real traffickers continue to do what they have been.
I have to agree with you. While not all of the details may not be revealed in this one article, according to the stated details, I would think he could only be charged with forced prostitution of a minor and/or kidnapping. Now, if it said he had taken the girls across state lines to johns, then we'd have trafficking, which may be the case seeing as California and Kentucky are mentioned.
view the rest of the comments →
wincraft71 ago
Sexual abuse is bad but I'd like to know since when sexual abuse of multiple victims is considered "human trafficking" or "sex trafficking". It seems that they're just throwing that label onto any sex-related crime now. Using force, coercion, or imprisonment to get somebody to perform a sex act is horrible, but not the same as a shipping container packed with immigrants or forcing someone to work in a massage parlor for years to work off their debt to the mafia.
Z11Mama ago
Sex trafficking does not mean they are being shipped in containers. It only means they are taken from one place to another for the purpose of sex. This being said I upvoated you because I believe I understand what you are saying and wholeheartedly agree. It is as if they are trying to say 'Look! We are arresting THE traffickers' when the real traffickers continue to do what they have been.
Enigmatic_Continuum ago
I have to agree with you. While not all of the details may not be revealed in this one article, according to the stated details, I would think he could only be charged with forced prostitution of a minor and/or kidnapping. Now, if it said he had taken the girls across state lines to johns, then we'd have trafficking, which may be the case seeing as California and Kentucky are mentioned.
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
This sub is controlled by the trafickers....so..yeah
Digital-Patriot ago
Do you honestly think that?
NoBS ago
The censorship aside, fuck yes it is!