I have checked over and over. The by lined article is 2008. The date references in the article date it to 2008. It is one of the many stories we have seen. And if you think about it and combine it with the evidence that points to Podesta's, in a way, the article well suggests then that Podesta's are the pedophile ring. Or am I reaching too far?
view the rest of the comments →
Z11Mama ago
So, an article from 2008. One of many stories about Madeline. This one conveniently clears Podestas. Not sure I believe it.
Vindicator ago
It's a new article.
Z11Mama ago
The article is dated 2008 and the multiple time references in the article date it as written in 2008. What did I miss? Is it a reprint?
Vindicator ago
Wasn't the article new (upper right hand corner date), with a large image of an email dated 2008 that was just released? Maybe I read it wrong.
Z11Mama ago
I have checked over and over. The by lined article is 2008. The date references in the article date it to 2008. It is one of the many stories we have seen. And if you think about it and combine it with the evidence that points to Podesta's, in a way, the article well suggests then that Podesta's are the pedophile ring. Or am I reaching too far?