I posted this picture of Obama and Maggie 14 months ago. It didn’t get a lot of traction. It was strictly of newspaper clipping. Voat was down for a couple of days . When it was back up, I went to look for my posting. The posting was there, but the picture was removed!!! Who has the authority to remove a picture from someone’s post? Whomever removed it is obviously working for Deep State. Please tell how to find out. This is evil, pure evil. https://postimg.cc/image/z6fibxhq5/ Pretty amazing this is allowed to happen.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1610796
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
Very very interesting, Dressage2.
I don't think it was Voat, since the link is still there. If you make your own subverse and play around with the buttons, you'll find that neither mods nor O's have the ability to edit other people's posts. They can remove comments and whole threads, but all that does is move them to the Removal logs. They stay on the site. Atko (Voat founder) and PuttItOut (Voat CEO) would be the only ones who might be able to tamper with the text of posts, and I've never heard of that happening on Voat.
More likely, postimg.cc got a DMCA takedown request from the copyright holder of that image and was forced to remove it, causing your link to break. This happened to many archived Pizzagate images in the early days on slim.g, Facebook and some of the archive sites. The sites were hit by Podesta and Alefantis' lawyers.
Interestingly, right after Q posted that picture last week, Voat went down, and he later affirmed it was because v/pizzagate was "Over the target."
Just five minutes after responding to the query about Voat, Q replied to his own post, saying "This door will be opened later".
It's possible that your original post about this picture over a year ago was too soon for the Swamp Draining plan, and white hats killed the photo on postimg. You may recall that a number of people were talking about pizzagate early on and then suddenly stopped, including:
Dressage2 ago
Very good observation. You are correct about the sudden silence. Ben Swann was another that buttoned up. I am hoping that was the case instead of someone able to tamper with the pic. I lost so many pics on Sli, which leads me to think maybe White Hats shut that down as well. I know there were many pics that were damning to DS. Thank for your reply. I don’t need any more paranoid episodes than I already have zooming in and out of my brain.
Vindicator ago
Yep, Swann is another to add to the list. Probably Cernovich, too, but I wouldn't call him a whitehat.
I try to zoom out and look at the overall pattern. Having worked as a writer, I recognized the outline of a communication campaign when I saw the food code post on 4chan. Looked to me like a "nudge" to get the diggers going in the right direction. Plus Wikileaks kept tweeting specific emails, as well. There was massive buzz as each new revelation was discovered, then Trump won and suddenly everyone starts to shush (except Webb, Crokin, Seaman, Steele, and Judicial Watch). Then Shareblue seemingly takes over the narrative with the Comet shooter, Russians, Trump Whitehouse in disarray etc. while the sealed indictments mount into the five figures and the resignations start coming by the score. Someone definitely has their hand on the tiller.
Blacksmith21 ago
"More likely, postimg.cc got a DMCA takedown request from the copyright holder of that image and was forced to remove it, causing your link to break. This happened to many archived Pizzagate images in the early days on slim.g, Facebook and some of the archive sites. The sites were hit by Podesta and Alefantis' lawyers."
Using DCMA is a very common tactic for getting rid of anything unsavory. Lawyers send a cease and desist letter to the ISP. It takes 2 minutes for them to remove and cost nothing in attorney fees. It's the path of least resistance.