Looky looky here.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/04/15/trail-of-james-comeys-dirt-on-loretta-lynch-discovered-within-ig-report-on-andrew-mccabe/
Looks like Lynch has some explaining to do. She threatened them with the Eric Garner case if they leaked ANYTHING out of Anthony Weiner's laptop. The rest below are my deductions based on this.
Where there's smoke there's fire. Only the guilty have something to hide.
This means that NYPD did in fact find some very damning evidence in that laptop, evidence LL and other Obama administration rats didn't want getting out. Its also HIGHLY likely that the "material that made hardened detectives vomit and cry" is in fact very real.
Resident shill Are We Sure is now officially a liar in his repeated claims that NYPD never had the laptop. He is also a liar when he claimed that there was no damning evidence in it either.
Perhaps those with hacker talents should start investigating said shill, for he is most likely an active accomplice, thus explaining his motive. @swordfish69
-Relevance to Pizzagate: We now have smoking gun proof. of a blatent cover up of incriminating evidence against people in high places
view the rest of the comments →
GreenDell144 ago
Generally, I find that ‘are we’ can present a useful sounding board, making valid claims stronger and straining out weaker ones. Sometimes, a comment from this voater actually helps expose particularly absurd and overwrought logical fallacies. Often the comments seem (to me) to be mean and contrary. However, ‘are we’ has been noticeably more aggrieved by this topic.
Are_we__sure ago
The laptop claims started circulating by anonmyous users on Facebook and Twitter and probably the chans. Then there was a coordinated campaign to push them that started with an article in the fake news site TruePundit.com
I came to this late, but when looked into the Weiner laptop claims I found ALL of them to be not only bullshit, but part of a coordinated campaign tied to the Trump campaign. The NY offices of the FBI was known to be very close to Trump and leaking like a sieve. As opposed to the counter intelligence group that was handling the Clinton email investigation and was not leaking.
I wrote several posts on here questioning and ultimately debunking these claims, I think I have the bookmark at home and will post later, but essentially the Comey letter came so close before the election that the Trump team saw an opportunity. They figured nobody would know why the case was reopened and they could flood the zone with bullshit as Steve Bannon called this strategy.
Some background
Guiliani went on TV, Fox, I believe and talked about a big surprise coming out regarding the Clinton investigation. BEFORE the Comey letter came out, so somebody on the FBI leaked to him
Then a coordinated push on these super secret, super criminal files on Weiner's laptop was pushed to the conspiracy crowd. Somebody put together a list of ProTrump people who pushed these stories or seemed to have knowledge they were going to come out.
Assange Bannon Flynn Giuliani Kallstrom Pirro Prince Trump Jr.
TruePundit came out with its article about secret NYPD sources having evidence and the FBI shutting them down and they will go public if Clinton is not indicted. This is a good place to start with this nonsense. Clinton was not indicted noone from NYPD went public (Why? Because this whole story is bullshit.)
Erik Prince went on Bannon's old radio show at Breitbart telling a similiar story with his secret NYPD sources
The Hagmann Report Guy went on Alex Jones's show. He let slip Rudy Guiliani was behind these stories and Alex Jones switched topics immediately.
All of these stories were about NYPD getting the laptop, finding evidence of dozens of crimes, that would take down many, many democrats, but the FBI stepped it and took it away from them. But if the FBI tried to cover them up the NYPD would expose it to the world.
It was all bullshit.
The FBI quickly reviewed the relevant files, found most were duplicates they already reviewed. NO OTHER CRIMES CHARGED. Just Weiner.
NYPD did bupkis. No exposure, no secret source coming forward, no release of the evidence copied by a NYPD Chief. Nothing.
Why because it was all bullshit. The NYPD NEVER HAD THE LAPTOP.
It was subpoenaed by the US attorney in NY, a federal supoena. The FBI seized the laptop and it never left their possession. It's completely false.
Comey made his letter public because he feared the partisans in the NY FBI office would leak it any way.
Why claim the NYPD had it? My guess is to take suspicion away from the folks who actually did leak it, people in the NY office of the FBI.
When Rolling Stone tried to get to bottom of where pizzagate started, they evidence of this bullshit NYPD claim circulating on line even before TruePundit and Erik Prince.
They found an anonymous woman in Joplin, Missouri was the first to push the story on Facebook and an anonymous anti-Semitic user on Twitter was the first to push the story on Twitter. THEY BOTH CLAIMED TO HAVE NYPD sources. This was before TruePundit and Erik Prince and the outline of the story AND THE SECRET NYPD SOURCES were already set.
A cat lady in Missouri posted this on Facebook.
Rolling Stone found out who this user was, Cynthia Campbell of Joplin, Missouri and wondered how a cat lady in Missouri had this inside scoop and deep NYPD sources. She called them fake news.
Rolling Stone went to talk to Hagmann about having "court ready sources" and when he revealed he had nothing, they were completely embarrassed for him. You have to listen to the audio, to really get this.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pizzagate-anatomy-of-a-fake-news-scandal-w511904
I truly hope the truth on all this is known one day. Because there's so many intriguing parts to it.
For example, the same day Trump Jr and the top leadership of Trump campaign is meeting with Russians in Trump Tower is the day TruePundit began publishing.
Pathetic.
darkknight111 ago
Shut up Killary mouthpiece. U mad your candidate lost fair and square? It isn't "her turn". There was no Russian collusion (only a total libtard would believe that).
Besides, your source is fake news anyway.
Hint: It's easy to identify fake news from the nature of the source. If its MSM or a left leaning source, then its fake news. Center or right leaning sources are more likely to tell the truth.
You're either a pedo or an accomplice because you NEVER do a single thing to help bust elite pedos. On the contrary, you do everything you can to defend them, especially if they're liberals.
Are_we_sure ago
You know that trying to DOX people is against VOAT rules don't you? You know that hacking me is illegal right?
You also call me a liar while pushing falsehoods. I don't even think you're competent enough to understand they are false.
The site you link to is lying to you. When you follow the links, you see that none of the links support the idea that the NYPD had the laptop first.
Nothing in the IG report says the NYPD had the laptop. The Fox report says "hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s [attorney] to sdny" in the last week of September. SDNY is the US Attorney's office for the Southern District of NY https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny
The actual laptop was seized the first week of October, by FBI agents. They got it directly from Weiner, not the NYPD.
Nothing in the IG report supports this claim.
Actually, the people she came down on were not the NYPD, but FBI officers. The NY Office of the FBI was leaking about the Eric Garner case. She came down hard about stopping political leaks of all kinds from within the Department of Justice.
Please show me any evidence that NYPD had the laptop. You have not refuted my argument. These links support my argument.
GreenDell144 ago
My experience with this starts with the Eric Prince an Rudy Guiliani details.
The whole thing about the laptop rests on that, then? It seems fair to be skeptical then. If there is MORE then we need to get it straight.