1) Currently link posts don't require a summary - but we will have a discussion about it later today or tomorrow via
a sticky on v/pizzagate. You are kindly invited to chime in! :-)
2) The child trafficking situation and elite pedophiles in the UK have always part of the Pizzagate investigation.
Since the lastest child rape scandal in the UK broke ten days ago, we established that the police was fully aware of these crimes, but didn't do anything about it. So this post confirms that the UK police is neglient regarding child rape offenders. It is important for the broader picture.
are you kidding ME? So why bother having a fking discussion at all on this Pizzagate board? Why not everyone just throw up links....then respond with a link.....then rebuttle THAT with a link. Links for everyone!
I AM NOT CLICKING ON ANYMORE FKING LINKS BY FKING LAZY IDIOTS WHO DONT HAVE THE INTELLECT TO FORM A COHERANT SUMMARY. THERE WAS A WHOLE DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS A MONTH AGO. Now you're switching back?
Yes, my contribution to the discussion about expanding on links is....EXPAND ON FCKING LINKS, LAZY FCKS.
@Think- in your No 2, above, you have ended up writing the summary/relevance FOR the OP. PROVING MY POINT!!!!!!!!
@carmencita, help. This is F-ING BS and a PUNCH IN FACE for long time contributors who spend hours formulating posts.
MV, I think you may be confused. I had a sticky up several weeks ago gathering feedback about the best way to deal with TITLES of posts that get the flair because the titles don't quite meet the rules. Link posts, being ONLY titles, were discussed, but we made no proposal to change the rules. Many people voiced an interest in doing so, which led to the sticky I just put up that think- mentioned to you. But the upshot of the title discussion was that Link posts with problem titles would be left up with the flair in cases where the OP might need help writing a better title for an otherwise good submission but immediately removed in cases where it was a clear Rule 1 violation or other abuse of the rules. Only now are we officially gathering the community's will regarding adding a new rule banning Link posts.
You are kindly invited to chime in and leave a comment (or two....).
Sorry, maybe I am a bit slow, but what exactly is
This is F-ING BS and a PUNCH IN FACE for long time contributors who spend hours formulating posts.
?
I gather that my comment didn't convince you and you would have liked us to delete this post?
THERE WAS A WHOLE DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS A MONTH AGO. Now you're switching back?
No, I'm not switching back. We have now opened a formal discussion about this in the sticky I linked. Also, we will soon have the opportunity to formally vote about the rules here.
Believe me, millennial, I'd like to abolish the link posts as soon as possible, I'm as much tired of them as you are.
Thank you @think- I appreciate the discussion and sticky about this topic. For me, it just boils down to click fatigue, more than anything else. Over it. in real life, if a blogger/YTuber/journalist is throwing up a link, its always accompanied by some relevant introductory paragraph/explanation, so I don't see why it should be excused on this site.
The other main worry is click spam. I don't know what the H I'm clicking on! Too many pranksters and enemies online now only too eager to send a CP link or virus our way. Like our time on Voat isn't buggy enough!
"Like our time on Voat isn't buggy enough!" LOL. Most def we have enough to worry about with posting copying and reading long articles and then have to worry while blurry eyed about having the very pics we are researching, pop up in front of our eyes! Nope.
Yes, you're absolutely right, @millennial_vulcan! I have to click all these links as a mod, and I can tell you I am soooooooooooooo tired of link posts!
(Although I admit that - ahem - most of my own posts here have been link posts. blushes and runs away)
Amen! I am also going to say that I believe that rules have been tightened up so that when there is a Warning Slapped on a post then some are helped and some are not. Also, that means that when there is no solution as to the PG connection then we are urged to self delete. I call this SELF IMMOLATION. Not being that tech savvy I did not realize til today that when you self delete, your post totally disappears. Not even mentioned in deleted posts section. So no one will ever find it, and I have a suspicion that it will not pop up under Alternative Search either. URG IS RIGHT. Do not brand me as a CT for writing this, because that would be a real slap in the face since that is what we are called by our enemies. @think-
I am also going to say that I believe that rules have been tightened up so that when there is a Warning Slapped on a post I am also going to say that I believe that rules have been tightened up so that when there is a Warning Slapped on a post then some are helped and some are not.
@Vindicator - would you please be so kind as to read millennial_vulcan's and Carmencita's comments above and share your thoughts about them? Thank you!
In my view, the rules haven't tighten up, Carm, we are more lenient than Millennial_Falcon was imo.
so that when there is a Warning Slapped on a post then some are helped and some are not.
Do you mean by the mods or by the community? Do you refer to your recent post about Robin Williams' co-star?
Sometimes I have ideas how we can let posts stay, sometimes I don't.
Your recent post was about a woman who was 27 at the time she was molested by Williams, and I unfortunately hadn't any idea how we could have altered the post so that it would have adhered to Rule 1: direct connection to elite pedophilia.
If I may add - Millennial_Falcon would have deleted it straight away. With the 'Edit Warning' flair it was at least visible until you deleted it. If you would prefer mod deletion, please tell us. I had recommended reposting to v/pizzagatewhatever, where all posts go that cover #MeToo.
And no, Carm, I don't think you are a concern troll, not at all. I try to understand your criticism, and you can criticize mod decisions any time.
When we will discuss Rule 1 anytime soon, you are kindly invited to chime in and suggest that #MeToo topics can stay in v/pizzagate.
I now am thinking that my connection should have gone the way of normalization by way of comedic artistry. Gary Marshall and the other person in the article seemed to be setting the tone as far as what was thought of as comedy on the set. I am now thinking that there is no way of why Dawber came out with this statement, but as we know, there are those that follow the lead of the moguls and will defend their army. If you get my drift. I just think there was a certain type of climate they were trying to establish on the set. Anything Goes. If you did not conform you were out.
view the rest of the comments →
millennial_vulcan ago
PLEASE SUMMARIZE AND POST THE STORY INSTEAD OF MAKING US CLICK ON LINKS.
YOU KNOW THE RULES.
ffs.
HOW IS THIS RELATED TO DC PIZZAGATE??????????????
UGGGHHHH.
@vindicator @think- Are we letting things slide again??? I am really done with this.
think- ago
Hi @millennial_vulcan, this submission adheres to the rules -
1) Currently link posts don't require a summary - but we will have a discussion about it later today or tomorrow via a sticky on v/pizzagate. You are kindly invited to chime in! :-)
2) The child trafficking situation and elite pedophiles in the UK have always part of the Pizzagate investigation.
Since the lastest child rape scandal in the UK broke ten days ago, we established that the police was fully aware of these crimes, but didn't do anything about it. So this post confirms that the UK police is neglient regarding child rape offenders. It is important for the broader picture.
Cheers, think-
@Vindicator
millennial_vulcan ago
are you kidding ME? So why bother having a fking discussion at all on this Pizzagate board? Why not everyone just throw up links....then respond with a link.....then rebuttle THAT with a link. Links for everyone!
I AM NOT CLICKING ON ANYMORE FKING LINKS BY FKING LAZY IDIOTS WHO DONT HAVE THE INTELLECT TO FORM A COHERANT SUMMARY. THERE WAS A WHOLE DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS A MONTH AGO. Now you're switching back?
Yes, my contribution to the discussion about expanding on links is....EXPAND ON FCKING LINKS, LAZY FCKS.
@Think- in your No 2, above, you have ended up writing the summary/relevance FOR the OP. PROVING MY POINT!!!!!!!!
@carmencita, help. This is F-ING BS and a PUNCH IN FACE for long time contributors who spend hours formulating posts.
URGH.
Vindicator ago
MV, I think you may be confused. I had a sticky up several weeks ago gathering feedback about the best way to deal with TITLES of posts that get the flair because the titles don't quite meet the rules. Link posts, being ONLY titles, were discussed, but we made no proposal to change the rules. Many people voiced an interest in doing so, which led to the sticky I just put up that think- mentioned to you. But the upshot of the title discussion was that Link posts with problem titles would be left up with the flair in cases where the OP might need help writing a better title for an otherwise good submission but immediately removed in cases where it was a clear Rule 1 violation or other abuse of the rules. Only now are we officially gathering the community's will regarding adding a new rule banning Link posts.
think- ago
Hi @millenial_vulcan, we currently have a discussion about link posts here:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagatemods/2460205
You are kindly invited to chime in and leave a comment (or two....).
Sorry, maybe I am a bit slow, but what exactly is
?
I gather that my comment didn't convince you and you would have liked us to delete this post?
No, I'm not switching back. We have now opened a formal discussion about this in the sticky I linked. Also, we will soon have the opportunity to formally vote about the rules here.
Believe me, millennial, I'd like to abolish the link posts as soon as possible, I'm as much tired of them as you are.
@Carmencita @Vindicator
millennial_vulcan ago
Thank you @think- I appreciate the discussion and sticky about this topic. For me, it just boils down to click fatigue, more than anything else. Over it. in real life, if a blogger/YTuber/journalist is throwing up a link, its always accompanied by some relevant introductory paragraph/explanation, so I don't see why it should be excused on this site.
The other main worry is click spam. I don't know what the H I'm clicking on! Too many pranksters and enemies online now only too eager to send a CP link or virus our way. Like our time on Voat isn't buggy enough!
@carmencita
carmencita ago
"Like our time on Voat isn't buggy enough!" LOL. Most def we have enough to worry about with posting copying and reading long articles and then have to worry while blurry eyed about having the very pics we are researching, pop up in front of our eyes! Nope.
think- ago
Yes, you're absolutely right, @millennial_vulcan! I have to click all these links as a mod, and I can tell you I am soooooooooooooo tired of link posts!
(Although I admit that - ahem - most of my own posts here have been link posts. blushes and runs away)
millennial_vulcan ago
LOOOOL!!! Naughty think-! Santa will NOT be paying you a visit this year!!!!!
carmencita ago
Amen! I am also going to say that I believe that rules have been tightened up so that when there is a Warning Slapped on a post then some are helped and some are not. Also, that means that when there is no solution as to the PG connection then we are urged to self delete. I call this SELF IMMOLATION. Not being that tech savvy I did not realize til today that when you self delete, your post totally disappears. Not even mentioned in deleted posts section. So no one will ever find it, and I have a suspicion that it will not pop up under Alternative Search either. URG IS RIGHT. Do not brand me as a CT for writing this, because that would be a real slap in the face since that is what we are called by our enemies. @think-
think- ago
@Vindicator - would you please be so kind as to read millennial_vulcan's and Carmencita's comments above and share your thoughts about them? Thank you!
In my view, the rules haven't tighten up, Carm, we are more lenient than Millennial_Falcon was imo.
Do you mean by the mods or by the community? Do you refer to your recent post about Robin Williams' co-star?
Sometimes I have ideas how we can let posts stay, sometimes I don't.
Your recent post was about a woman who was 27 at the time she was molested by Williams, and I unfortunately hadn't any idea how we could have altered the post so that it would have adhered to Rule 1: direct connection to elite pedophilia.
If I may add - Millennial_Falcon would have deleted it straight away. With the 'Edit Warning' flair it was at least visible until you deleted it. If you would prefer mod deletion, please tell us. I had recommended reposting to v/pizzagatewhatever, where all posts go that cover #MeToo.
And no, Carm, I don't think you are a concern troll, not at all. I try to understand your criticism, and you can criticize mod decisions any time.
When we will discuss Rule 1 anytime soon, you are kindly invited to chime in and suggest that #MeToo topics can stay in v/pizzagate.
.
carmencita ago
I now am thinking that my connection should have gone the way of normalization by way of comedic artistry. Gary Marshall and the other person in the article seemed to be setting the tone as far as what was thought of as comedy on the set. I am now thinking that there is no way of why Dawber came out with this statement, but as we know, there are those that follow the lead of the moguls and will defend their army. If you get my drift. I just think there was a certain type of climate they were trying to establish on the set. Anything Goes. If you did not conform you were out.