You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Hey MP,

Intriguing post. It is rather odd that Holder and Comey would use the not so common word "substance" on the same day. It seems highly speculative to connect this to Q's March Madness quote, though, so I am going to go ahead and give this our "Unverified" flair.

I'm not clear what you mean when you say:

Another of Q's Messages is proven accurate

How is the Q Leak you post proven accurate? Because Comey mentioned the basketball tournament? That's not really intellectually honest, and saying it invites ridicule of Q. Here is the only Q Leak using that word: https://files.catbox.moe/erk7jj.png

Beware: Adrenochrome "elixer" is Fake News probably designed to cover up parabiosis

Q has never mentioned adrenochrome. While it is a very tantalizing theory, there has never been any real evidence presented that it is anything but part of the cover psyop, though @SecondAmendment did find a veterinary drug that was somewhat similar. I can't tell you how many posts we've had to remove from v/pizzagate that pushed this theory with no actual evidence that it is even pharmacokinetically possible. Erowid has a pretty good set of articles on it.

Adrenochrome was popularized by Hunter Thompson's fiction, and that guy had Cabal written all over him. I think adrenochrome is an example of a "Flooding Fake" like the second Comet hacking was. It's to cover something similar with easily debunked fake news -- probably parabiosis (young blood transfusions) maybe from aborted fetuses.

Beware, though: "Adrenochrome" is Fake News pushed to discredit our investigation.

@think-

migratorypatterns ago

You know, this post is more trouble than it's worth. I posted it because I thought people should see this and deliberately didn't select one of the other topics that deserve dumpster diving because I don't have that much time these days. And here I am, rambling on and on and on explaining what is clearly speculation.

How is the Q Leak you post proven accurate?

Okay, I had to reread my post twice and don't see where I used those words. Where did I say anything was PROVEN ACCURATE? Or did I merely state that MARCH MADNESS aligns perfectly with the tweet of James Comey TO our Kenyan president? Further, Comey states that The Kenyan has STATIONARY ... spelled with an 'A', but why would you expect anyone in The Kenyan years to know the difference between STATIONARY and STATIONERY since none of them knew how to speak English or spell.

I don't have the personalized bracket stationary like @BarackObama but I got the substance. (and a smoother shot (tbh) t

So The Kenyan who occupied The Oval Office which outside of The Rothschild's and Soros is the highest position in the US highest puppet position in the US has PERSONALIZED BRACKET STATIONERY. And you don't think that's a correlation that to MARCH MADNESS? Or the fact that Holder used a basketball player's name for his hidden AMAIL ECCOUNT (just a little spelling humor ... I've got to amuse myself somehow these days). But you're right .... why would I assume someone with personalized stationery would be into this ... or that March Madness would connect in any way, shape, or form to someone who could have anything and yet chose to have personalized stationery. I must be crazy to think it was important to The Kenyan, Comey, or Holder ... and I shamed the entire community .... wow!

Not sure what is going on and how anyone is discredited nor do I see where I mentioned Q saying THE SUBSTANCE was adrenochrome. Could you please supply the direct quote where I said this please? Here is the only speculative quote I see:

quote THE SUBSTANCE unquote can be referring to just about anything. But when used in the context it is, it strongly harkens to this elixir the elite are using to keep young. While it may be referring to stem cells, blood, or adenochrome, all are produced by the harvesting of the young.

This. This is what I said. Again, I don't see where I'm tying Q into him saying what I said, but then I'm not Aric Holder or James Comay (ha!)

Because I merely included adenochrome into the mix is what's getting you upset? And you're using the argument that we're going to look foolish because quote THEY unquote are telling us it doesn't exist? This is the same THEY who are telling us there are more than two sexes?

In the first place, adenochrome does exist. It's a molecular compound that is found in medical journals so let's dispense with that argument because it defies logic to deny what is fact.

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Adrenochrome

Chemical Names: Adrenochrome; 54-06-8; Adraxone; USAF uctl-7; 3-Hydroxy-1-methyl-5,6-indolinedione; 1-Adrenochrome More... Molecular Formula: C9H9NO3 Molecular Weight: 179.175 g/mol InChI Key: RPHLQSHHTJORHI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Pigment obtained by the oxidation of epinephrine. Adrenochrome, chemical formula C9H9NO3, is a pigment obtained by the oxidation of adrenaline (epinephrine). Adrenochrome monosemicarbazone, also known as carbazochrome, is a hemostatic, meaning it reduces capillary bleeding.

So what part of this don't you believe exists? Or are we on the same page? Maybe it's the fact that this substance is being used in the way it is purportedly being used that's bothering you although I don't know why. A chemical cannot be part of psyops. Cannot! What other chemical is singled out for such an honor? Please name one that is in the catalogued scientific database that THEY are saying doesn't exist and is part of a psyops operation?

I guess I'm onboard with a bunch of carnivores because in the vegan community, the corruption and contamination of meat by chemical reaction fo livestock's fear has been well-documented and talked about for years. It, too, was ridiculed, but how can you ridicule chemistry? But then again, how can you deny biology? Seems THEY've done that to, and you're okay with that and giving lip service to preposterous ideas and suppressing exploration into possibilities because THEY'll say we're crazy? Hmmmm ....

In terms of the meat, here are but a few articles that chronicle adrenaline's adverse reaction on meat:>

http://www.grass-fed-solutions.com/cattle-stress.html How Cattle Stress Affects Beef Tenderness and Flavor

http://sciencenordic.com/meat-stressed-animals-unhealthy Is meat from stressed animals unhealthy? We love steak and sausages, but does a high level of axiety in animals make them unhealthy to eat?

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2011/08/how-animal-welfare-leads-to-better-meat-a-lesson-from-spain/244127/ How Animal Welfare Leads to Better Meat: A Lesson From Spain Spain's stress-free, acorn-eating Ibérico pigs produce healthier, tastier ham—and modern food science explains why

Remember, these articles are written from the standpoint of a group of people who don't want to introduce these things into their body. They desire to stay peaceful and calm. But this will give the groundwork for understanding that if a group wanted the reverse which would be the hypothetical situation of meat charged with these unhealthy, barbarous side effects of chemical reactions to fear, torture, and captivity, then the would have to introduce those stress factors into the curation of such a food supply. So again, hypothethetically, if a group of say cannibals fed on a meat supply, again, hypothetically, that was oh .... children ... they would have to impose these conditions upon aforementioned to produce the required effect.

I can also give a history of stem cell and how a man interested in longevity used to sell a product that worked on this theory of young cells rejuvenating older cells. His claim was deemed witchcraft and voodoo science and he was thrown in jail by our own witchcraft bureau the FDA for FRAUD and FALSE CLAIMS. Interestingly enough, he was pardoned by ... Bill Clinton ... hmmmmm ....

So you be you and I'll be me. I will accept your citing of what THEY say to keep us peons quiet for fear of being called stupid, crazy, whatever.