You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

twistedmac11 ago

Relevance?

NoBS ago

To prove how censoring even the shrills makes it harder to ID the crazies. By removing proof that they are possibly insane. So we can repeat history and dumb down the peasents through the control of opinions and ideas, hower imature or just fucking out there.

Like the Flat Earthers, we need to let them post so we can flag them personally. Without control freaks who help hide the useful idiots on a soap box.

Why would we not want to know who is posting Terrorist treats? Make it easy to find them by protecting free speech.

Is this not the goal of of this medium? To learn who, what and when.

How is that done if you remove or retard the evidence?

GeorgeT ago

Deserves 50 upvoates!

twistedmac11 ago

I didn't say anything about removing it, I just asked what the relevance was. For the most part, I actually agree with your stance; my only concern would be it cluttering up the sub, which makes it harder for the non-shills to see the real stuff.

Blacksmith21 ago

I second that. Please add something how her breaking her wrist relates to Pizzagate. Thanks.

Micheal84 ago

There isn't, will delete this post soon.

Blacksunshine ago

Just laughing at the left some more.

Shillary.

Killary.

Slippary.

Fat ugly cunt.

See - it's like a fun rhyming game!

Gothamgirl ago

I saw "skankles" on a few posts lol.

twistedmac11 ago

The left has plenty of reasons to laugh at the right as well. It's all for show, don't fall for it.