Many will be surprised by this "interest in science" from a US equivalent of Jimmy Savile, running a compromise and control ring. Why target academics? Academics influence public opinion and beliefs, and politically correct lies need protection. To get to the top of academic fields, where public influence is great, it helps to be seen to be "reliable". Who would be more reliable, than someone filmed on Epstein's "Sex Jet", travelling to "Pedophile Island".
Note that Epstein has claimed to have been a founding director of the Clinton Foundation, which also appears to run a compromise and control scheme, which appeared at the heart of PizzaGate.
There is a list of big names that he took on his sex jet shown in photo copies of his flight log that are no doubt still online, and a list of names in his phone book including billionaires, royalty, politicians and key university academics. Note that Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz were frequent flyers on the "Sex jet". Brilliant article by Nick Bryant: http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-pedophile-billio-1681039971
Alan Dershowitz, who stood to be prosecuted himself for using the Pedophile Jet, was a key defender of Epstein. When Epstein was let off with a slap on the wrist, it looked bad enough to the public, that a new case was taken up against the state on behalf of some of the young women used as slaves in this scandal. That seemed reasonable. But then added to that case was a new claim from "Jane Doe 3" that Alan Dershowitz had sex with her in many places. The court then found that to be "impossible". Was that new claim added so that later publicity dismissing that claim, could "exonerate" Alan Dershowitz in the eyes of the public?
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/alan-dershowitz-jeffrey-epstein-settlement-2016-4?r=US&IR=T
But why did Epstein fund these "scientists"?
In my view Epstein's role was to further compromise paid academic propagandists. Academic scientists are paid to indoctrinate students with known lies, and manage public opinion. Managing such a system of lies can be done with peer pressure and the potential to end careers. But surely someone might grow a conscience, even if only near retirement. So at the highest most influential levels of "science", further compromise is extra insurance. After a filming session on "Pedophile Island", an academic can be trusted and his career in controversial areas can progress.
Note that our state religion as taught in public schools and university is Evolutionism. To give you an idea of how carefully protected that religion is consider the following two articles just regarding evolution and global warming.
A book review of "Slaughter of the Dissidents" a book listing many cases of ordinary academics losing their jobs for writing articles that in any way questioned evolutionary dogma...
https://web.archive.org/web/20170403043220/https://creation.com/slaughter-of-the-dissidents
Is it just science that's complete nonsense? Is it just science that is "compromised", with most papers being fraudulent or mistaken?
Well... no. Harvard Business school was exposed in the very good Charles Ferguson documentary "Inside Job". It's brilliantly funny and absolutely nails the leadership of Harvard Business school and the Fed Reserve in very revealing interviews. For example, Harvard indoctrinated generations of students on the great economic benefits of banking de-regulation, while professors sat on the boards of companies set up by the very same Investment banks that stood to gain from shifting public opinion on the issue. That is not unusual. That is how everyday life in academia works. Just search for "Inside Job" on Amazon. A superb documentary.
How much do academics lie? Surely they wouldn't lie about anything life threatening, like a drug trial or vaccination...
British Medical Journal: "Most scientific studies are wrong" - Published by "amateurs" to advance a career, or outright fraudulent. 60% wrong or fraudulent by well known estimates.
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2014/01/31/richard-smith-medical-research-still-a-scandal/
But what about peer review? Surely that must ensure a high standard of honesty and accuracy?
When a computer program was put online generating scientific papers using buzz words and phrases, at least 120 fake papers were published in peer reviewed journals, some very prestigious publications. How did so many bogus papers get published in prestigious peer reviewed Journals? Peer Review is merely to ensure political correctness. Its not for scientific accuracy. Had any of those papers been published with a title like "Anthropological Global Warming Questioned", it would not have been published:
http://blog.scielo.org/en/2014/03/31/in-the-beginning-it-was-just-plagiarism-now-its-computer-generated-fake-papers-as-well/#.WqoWEci-lE4
In context of the massive levels of fraud and propaganda in academia, particularly in "science", it is no surprise that top university academics are a target of Epstein's sexual compromise and control scheme. This is what is needed to get to the top in academia today. That is what makes a propagandist, truly reliable.
view the rest of the comments →
BeTidy ago
Many will be surprised by this "interest in science" from a US equivalent of Jimmy Savile, running a compromise and control ring. Why target academics? Academics influence public opinion and beliefs, and politically correct lies need protection. To get to the top of academic fields, where public influence is great, it helps to be seen to be "reliable". Who would be more reliable, than someone filmed on Epstein's "Sex Jet", travelling to "Pedophile Island".
Note that Epstein has claimed to have been a founding director of the Clinton Foundation, which also appears to run a compromise and control scheme, which appeared at the heart of PizzaGate.
Supporting details on the case:
Epstein compromised a large number of academic scientists. His science funding was for compromise and control. He flew many University academics on his Sex Jet to "Pedophile Island", and spent countless millions funding evolution and neuro science. Here's a Hawkins and academics story with photos : https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking/11340494/Stephen-Hawking-pictured-on-Jeffrey-Epsteins-Island-of-Sin.html
On the funding side, this article gives a taste of it (Many articles have been scrubbed). Tens of millions spent on Evolutionary and Neuro science and buying "scientists": https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/07/evolution-harvard-christina-galbraith/
There is a list of big names that he took on his sex jet shown in photo copies of his flight log that are no doubt still online, and a list of names in his phone book including billionaires, royalty, politicians and key university academics. Note that Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz were frequent flyers on the "Sex jet". Brilliant article by Nick Bryant: http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-pedophile-billio-1681039971
Alan Dershowitz, who stood to be prosecuted himself for using the Pedophile Jet, was a key defender of Epstein. When Epstein was let off with a slap on the wrist, it looked bad enough to the public, that a new case was taken up against the state on behalf of some of the young women used as slaves in this scandal. That seemed reasonable. But then added to that case was a new claim from "Jane Doe 3" that Alan Dershowitz had sex with her in many places. The court then found that to be "impossible". Was that new claim added so that later publicity dismissing that claim, could "exonerate" Alan Dershowitz in the eyes of the public? https://www.businessinsider.com.au/alan-dershowitz-jeffrey-epstein-settlement-2016-4?r=US&IR=T
But why did Epstein fund these "scientists"?
In my view Epstein's role was to further compromise paid academic propagandists. Academic scientists are paid to indoctrinate students with known lies, and manage public opinion. Managing such a system of lies can be done with peer pressure and the potential to end careers. But surely someone might grow a conscience, even if only near retirement. So at the highest most influential levels of "science", further compromise is extra insurance. After a filming session on "Pedophile Island", an academic can be trusted and his career in controversial areas can progress.
Note that our state religion as taught in public schools and university is Evolutionism. To give you an idea of how carefully protected that religion is consider the following two articles just regarding evolution and global warming.
The ban on comments in News Papers and "Science" journals to protect Global Warming propaganda and Evolutionism... https://web.archive.org/web/20170428092218/www.dailytech.com/Editorial+PopSci+Kills+Comments+Blames+Global+Warming+Evolution/article33437.htm
A book review of "Slaughter of the Dissidents" a book listing many cases of ordinary academics losing their jobs for writing articles that in any way questioned evolutionary dogma... https://web.archive.org/web/20170403043220/https://creation.com/slaughter-of-the-dissidents
Is it just science that's complete nonsense? Is it just science that is "compromised", with most papers being fraudulent or mistaken?
Well... no. Harvard Business school was exposed in the very good Charles Ferguson documentary "Inside Job". It's brilliantly funny and absolutely nails the leadership of Harvard Business school and the Fed Reserve in very revealing interviews. For example, Harvard indoctrinated generations of students on the great economic benefits of banking de-regulation, while professors sat on the boards of companies set up by the very same Investment banks that stood to gain from shifting public opinion on the issue. That is not unusual. That is how everyday life in academia works. Just search for "Inside Job" on Amazon. A superb documentary.
How much do academics lie? Surely they wouldn't lie about anything life threatening, like a drug trial or vaccination... British Medical Journal: "Most scientific studies are wrong" - Published by "amateurs" to advance a career, or outright fraudulent. 60% wrong or fraudulent by well known estimates. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2014/01/31/richard-smith-medical-research-still-a-scandal/
But what about peer review? Surely that must ensure a high standard of honesty and accuracy?
When a computer program was put online generating scientific papers using buzz words and phrases, at least 120 fake papers were published in peer reviewed journals, some very prestigious publications. How did so many bogus papers get published in prestigious peer reviewed Journals? Peer Review is merely to ensure political correctness. Its not for scientific accuracy. Had any of those papers been published with a title like "Anthropological Global Warming Questioned", it would not have been published: http://blog.scielo.org/en/2014/03/31/in-the-beginning-it-was-just-plagiarism-now-its-computer-generated-fake-papers-as-well/#.WqoWEci-lE4
In context of the massive levels of fraud and propaganda in academia, particularly in "science", it is no surprise that top university academics are a target of Epstein's sexual compromise and control scheme. This is what is needed to get to the top in academia today. That is what makes a propagandist, truly reliable.