@ChangingPerspectives: I will remove the flair, as the title adequately describes the content, and link post don't require a description in a comment (although we always appreciate a short summary of the linked article).
Yeah...I think the policy about direct-linking got confused yesterday. We've had people submit Link posts that direct-linked to PDFs and Google Docs with very uninformative titles and no warning they were being sent to potentially dangerous links. As this one just goes to a website and has a decently descriptive title, it's okay as is.
I think the others could be get a security flair and be left up as long as the title clearly describes the content and relevancy, or removed if it does not.
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
@ChangingPerspectives: I will remove the flair, as the title adequately describes the content, and link post don't require a description in a comment (although we always appreciate a short summary of the linked article).
@Blacksmith21 @Vindicator
Vindicator ago
Yeah...I think the policy about direct-linking got confused yesterday. We've had people submit Link posts that direct-linked to PDFs and Google Docs with very uninformative titles and no warning they were being sent to potentially dangerous links. As this one just goes to a website and has a decently descriptive title, it's okay as is.
I think the others could be get a security flair and be left up as long as the title clearly describes the content and relevancy, or removed if it does not.
@Blacksmith21 @ben_matlock @Honeybee_ Sound good?
think- ago
Yep. :-)