Remember (in general) the 70/30 propaganda rule for public consumption and info manipulation (okay, not really a rule but sounds good lol, will cite source later):
Mix 70% truth with 30% of whatever is necessary to frame or reframe that truth and keep control of a desired narrative or dismiss/diminish the truth. Use the toolkit (I'm justing list what comes to my mind):
minimize, dismiss as dated, dismiss as resolved, dismiss as 'about to be resolved anyway'
dismiss as unimportant/irrelevant when compared to shiny trigger objects and sudden "SQUIRREL!!" statements.
use misleading words that imply the opposite/lesser meaning, or shape the conclusion to something you want it to be
cite sources that are part of the same propaganda team, but appear unrelated
make the desired conclusion align with something the target audience wants to hear or currently is conducive to believing (especially following a grooming period)
*make a case for suspending doubt, and cultivate (groom) trust
repeat often, gradually adjust the target audience's expectations, so that it's worse (cognitive dissonance) to examine one's further doubts (thereby losing the trust investment), than it is to accept diminishing promises
dismiss/chide those who voice increasing doubt ratios, reward those who invest more (trust) and accept less
The Q-phenom has yet to demonstrate 'the nails in the coffins'. There are worrisome elements to it. However, I've learned more info based on researching certain Q related leads, then I would have otherwise. Unfortunately part of what I've learned not only doesn't 'prove' Q, but instead could indicate some nasty end stages of a long game. Not saying it is, just saying.
view the rest of the comments →
Dickface808 ago
Yeah in our fucking dreams...
MolochHunter ago
well, Q is really waving his dick in the wind with this one. if nothing comes of it the groypers will abandon him in droves
GeorgeT ago
It's pretty much common knowledge that the original Q had been replaced by an impostor. But we shell see.
Psalm144-1 ago
Thank you GeorgeT. Its nice to see someone around here can sniff out the New Q bullshit too.
kestrel9 ago
Remember (in general) the 70/30 propaganda rule for public consumption and info manipulation (okay, not really a rule but sounds good lol, will cite source later):
Mix 70% truth with 30% of whatever is necessary to frame or reframe that truth and keep control of a desired narrative or dismiss/diminish the truth. Use the toolkit (I'm justing list what comes to my mind):
The Q-phenom has yet to demonstrate 'the nails in the coffins'. There are worrisome elements to it. However, I've learned more info based on researching certain Q related leads, then I would have otherwise. Unfortunately part of what I've learned not only doesn't 'prove' Q, but instead could indicate some nasty end stages of a long game. Not saying it is, just saying.