In a recent interview with the Times magazine, Richard Dawkins attempted to defend what he called "mild pedophilia," which, he says, he personally experienced as a young child and does not believe causes "lasting harm."
Dawkins went on to say that one of his former school masters "pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts," and that to condemn this "mild touching up" as sexual abuse today would somehow be unfair.
"I am very conscious that you can't condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don't look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can't find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today," he said.
Plus, he added, though his other classmates also experienced abuse at the hands of this teacher, "I don't think he did any of us lasting harm."
https://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/
This is not the first time. Multiple times he has tried to normalize pedophilia.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/richard-dawkins-defends-mild-pedophilia-again-and-again/311230/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1iSxEtgEGs
What the hell is wrong with this man?
Wikipedia on him:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins
Dawkins has been awarded many prestigious academic and writing awards and he makes regular television, radio and Internet appearances, predominantly discussing his books, his atheism, and his ideas and opinions as a public intellectual.
He has won numerous awards and is known as one of the world's top scientists. Seriously.
view the rest of the comments →
eucalyptus_spearmint ago
Richarf Dawkins: pedophile.
EvaEverywhere ago
That doesn't mean he is a pedophile. This board has to come up with an appropriate term for the people we talk about here. They don't have an appreciation for children, sexual or otherwise. They want to control and use babies as they see fit and see children as less than human. It's not a "phile" situation or a "phobe" situation, it's something else. I call them Krampus monsters these days but we need a word for these people. They are not exactly pedophiles, their activities are so much wider in scope and philosophy and they collaborate. Also, nobody wants to use the word pedophile because the media has been successful in erasing this "bad guy" by avoiding the topic altogether. People think pedos are super rare and they work alone... not true.
eucalyptus_spearmint ago
Don't care. He deserves to be shamed just as if he was one. Precision and classification, let that be sime "scientists" (ha) goal. I'm not about that. I'm about these people being thrown into the proverbial trash heap. Good day.