In a recent interview with the Times magazine, Richard Dawkins attempted to defend what he called "mild pedophilia," which, he says, he personally experienced as a young child and does not believe causes "lasting harm."
Dawkins went on to say that one of his former school masters "pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts," and that to condemn this "mild touching up" as sexual abuse today would somehow be unfair.
"I am very conscious that you can't condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don't look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can't find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today," he said.
Plus, he added, though his other classmates also experienced abuse at the hands of this teacher, "I don't think he did any of us lasting harm."
https://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/
This is not the first time. Multiple times he has tried to normalize pedophilia.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/richard-dawkins-defends-mild-pedophilia-again-and-again/311230/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1iSxEtgEGs
What the hell is wrong with this man?
Wikipedia on him:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins
Dawkins has been awarded many prestigious academic and writing awards and he makes regular television, radio and Internet appearances, predominantly discussing his books, his atheism, and his ideas and opinions as a public intellectual.
He has won numerous awards and is known as one of the world's top scientists. Seriously.
view the rest of the comments →
GeorgeT ago
I like how he advocated material universe and mainstream science while saying that his grasp of quantum mechanics is abysmal! A prisoner of thought of his owm making. A joke! (Am an Engineer, and I come from a family of prominent scientist and I put Dawking in Degrasse Tyson category - frauds propped up by the pedo/satanic/ globalists. Before one disses something he would be adviced to do some reaarch. Religion such as Christianity, New Testament (whether you interpret it literally or see it as an allegory - my view) is a necessary element in our culture and primary function of which serves as a moral compass, safeguarding us from the very abominations that has come to be known as PG! Dawkins is a traitor to human morality and to humanity in general. That useful idiot is oblivious to the fact that Darwin was sponsored by the Luciferians with the aim of denigrating humam to a mere evolved ape, divorced from God (again, literal or allegorical - all the same) thus legitimizing all his actions including such abomination as pedophilia as mere animal instinct. I really do wish to have my chance to debate with that fool and take him apart. I digress but, I must state Darwin's theory is not a scientific theory, for though it explains how species evolve it cannot predict!! And a scientific theory whether it's Newtonian Mechanics or Quantum Mechanics, or General Relativity - as mind boggling as the concepts may seem, they all predict! Now take a peculiar specie such as Leopard Cheetah (fastest land animal on earth, covers 100m in 5.95s!!!) It's DNA is so precise that you can graft a fur from one Leopard onto another and it will not be rejected! You cannot transplant human hair onto another - it will be rejected. Hence the ongoing quest to cure male pattern boldness. The conclusion is that the only specie that Cheetah could have evolved from is - Leopard Cheetah. I digressed but my point being that even though I do not believe in a creation (or the creator) I have qualms about denouncing idiocy such as Darwinian Evolution and its shill proponents such as Richard Dawking. He has served his pedo/satanic masters very well and subsequently he got rewarded.
Cc1914 ago
Wow well put ! Did I hear you right , you don't believe in a creator or creation?
ThatGuy2018 ago
Better not fall for disinformation in regards to Hitler. The man closed the freemason lodges and occult societies in Germany, and most importantly, removed the synagogue of satan, that is, organized talmudic "jewry", from positions of power. Not a very good "Luciferian globalist" now was he? Also he was not funded by them. That is another myth that never dies.
Hitler's thoughts on what you call "Luciferian globalism", which is nothing but talmudic judaism, masonry being but one branch of the beast:
"My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. And as a man I have the duty to see to it that human society does not suffer the same catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the ancient world some two thousand years ago—a civilization which was driven to its ruin through this same Jewish people." -in a speech in 1922
Ouch.
Anyway, as for Dawkins, he is without a doubt a freemason as are all the puppets that promote science fiction. Look into whatever "father of modern science" and they are almost without an exception freemasons. This is particularly true when it comes to religious doctrines that seek to discredit the existence of God as we know him from the Bible. Religious doctrines such as Evolution, Big Bang etc., all invented by masons. For example, Darwin came from a line of prominent masons.
Also, Dawkins is no doubt a child rapist. Being such comes with the territory of being a high-level puppet, it would seem. I would expect as much from him even if he hadn't uttered that disgusting statement of his. That only further enforces it, though.
GeorgeT ago
As I said, the ruling elite rule us along the fault lines. Christianity of today is world's apart from the gnostic Christian sect. Bottom line is, whether one believes in Literal Jesus or an allegory is all the same to me.
PedoStomper ago
But wait, didn't the Nazis have entire operations and groups dedicated to researching and collecting occult artifacts? I've always heard that Hitler was huge into the occult; is that not true?
think- ago
Himmler was the one in the Nazi government that was very deeply involved in occult stuff. He sent researchers to Tibet. Hitler was able to gain access to High Society via the Thule Society, whose members were interested in Theosophy. They supported him when he was beginning to appear as a public speaker.
The 'Vril Society' (spelling?) on the other hand, never existed imo. There are lots of myths and false info on the internet, and also in popular books, about Nazis and the occult.
GreenDell144 ago
Biology and anthropology are fascinatingly complex. Just to replicate DNA, an organic molecule has to zip along the DNA strand at the speed of a train (in relative terms) covering the entire chromosome very quickly (which for our species has about as much data as the internet), It reads the DNA in front of it, collect the huge and complex proteins (and correctly fold them), carefully unzip the helix, arrange the proteins in the way that they were read, re-zip the helix, and lastly check for errors (flagging a protein alert if one is found). All of these happen in a barely understood way, because all that is detectable is the result, which happens very frequently (in the digestive system it happens in seconds). Materialist say that this molecular robot, a replication ribosome, happened by chance, Google it and select images. There are no good ones. It’s too small. The best argument they have is that we are too dumb to understand and that we should trust them.
Because of this complexity, self proclaimed ‘experts’ can step in and hypnotize the masses. The say “trust us, we know” and “ it is probably to hard for you to understand”. This works great for atheists, especially those WHO DON’T WANT God to exist (regardless of whether He does or not).
I believe that viruses are the apparatus for changes in species. Check out the mimivirus. I wonder if a virus like this could be responsible for directing species to change. Then the question becomes “Who controls the virus?”. No transitional forms. Tons of inaccuracies. Tons of hoaxes. I teach that evolution is a respectable theory, because I have to, but I haven’t believed for decades. I used to believe in evolution. By the time I completed my studies in anthropology, I was completely red pilled. The odds against are astronomical, and all of its best points are cherry picked evidences, refuted hokum, or retracted BS. Blind faith, virtue signaling, cognitive dissonance and elitism keep it popular.
GeorgeT ago
Great piece. Would love to read your essays on the subject.
GreenDell144 ago
I actually stand on the shoulders of others, I admit. I teach Biology, but I am most impressed by the ones doing research in the field.
GeorgeT ago
We have unseen operators at work, beyond 5 sense reality. Just because I am not a creatinist does not make me an atheist which is another cult.
GreenDell144 ago
That speaks to your ability to reason. Its a shame that most refuse to feed their mind and farm their thinking respinsibilities out to others. Have you ever considered the mimivirus? I subscribe to the old school virology thinking: it doesnt eat/grow/repeoduce/etc... So it doesnt classify as a living thing. Viruses infiltrate and insert DNA instructions into cells of living things. The cells use thise instructions to do all of the virus' hard work. Check out a virus that has DNA for eyes, gills, photosynthesis, and abilities unkown from several species:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gcYH6se6Cdo
The popular explanation against the theory that I put here is based on a special theory of evolution for viruses. This theory has some very weak points: assumes evolution, then applies it to viruses w/o any evidence. Popular scientists dont want to consider the obvious; that mimivirus inserts instructions into cells that cause them to change and do things as a new 'species'. "Viral Selection" is a compelling theory, despite its censorship. Enjoy!
GeorgeT ago
Thanks for the link. I will watch it several times. Frome Umberto Eco's Name of the Rose Apprentice 'Do you ever make mistakes?' William of Baskerville answers: 'Of course I do, but instead of one I conjure many, so I become the slave of none!' If only our new class of priests (scientists, doctors etc) abide by this noble principle.
Cc1914 ago
Wow that was your profession? I'm glad you didn't let evolution make a monkey out of you! 🙂
GreenDell144 ago
I am now teaching Biology.
septimasexta ago
Nice. "That useful idiot is oblivious to the fact that Darwin was sponsored by the same Luciferians that bankrolled Hitler and Mao, who sponsored 'Gay Rights' " Can you name names? I'm very interested in this topic. I know Darwin's family was related to the Darwin-Wedgewood families. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin–Wedgwood_family
burnitalldown ago
I fucking hate materialists. They're the cause of everything wrong with the world.
Him and that other retard in the wheelchair (that rode the lolita express) are both puppets.
letsdothis1 ago
Couldn't agree more.
GeorgeT ago
Steven Hawking - another shill, cult personality propped up by another Shill Degrasse Tyson. How many shills are there? Drain the swamp takes on a new meaning.
Enigmatic_Continuum ago
Don't laugh, but I truly believe Hawking died and what we see now is an animatronic with which the elite speak through.
eucalyptus_spearmint ago
Lmao
Enigmatic_Continuum ago
OK, yeah, it's a funny idea unless you're Hawking.
eucalyptus_spearmint ago
He drank the kool-aid and rode the loli express. I'm over caring 'bout his feels. But mostly it was just the way you put it that made me guffaw. 😂
Enigmatic_Continuum ago
That's right! I totally forgot about him being on Epstein's plane. Creepy. Glad I could make you laugh! That's few and far between with this dark topic.
csp ago
This isn't far fetched, the facial features of young Hawking appear nothing like current Hawking. Either way, he's definitely a mouth piece for spreading propaganda.
scarlettm512 ago
I think you are right, but even if he didn't die, I honestly don't think that he is actually speaking to us through that computerized voice. Someone is -- but I don't think it is him. It does seem likely to me that they have found a look alike who can't communicate and are using him to distribute propaganda because no one will really dare to harshly debate or criticize a "genius" in his condition.
Enigmatic_Continuum ago
Whatever's going on, it's definitely strange. All I know is that they're going to have to let him go eventually, whoever he is. They'll probably announce that he's dying, but they've successfully uploaded his consciousness into a computer, which will be put into another body. Hawking will then be immortal, and he will forever be a prisoner of the puppetmasters.
burnitalldown ago
Yeah him.