You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

EricKaliberhall ago

Hey @slickleg64

Your post must include a link. I'm giving you a 24hr flair to edit one in (Not Worldcorp). Rules are in the sidebar for more information. Thanks.

Fateswebb ago

Whaaaaa? Why must a post include a link? Is this a new(ER) rule? When was this instated? And why can't the link be worldcorp? So now if you simply want to discuss something you can't do so without a link? What is the thought process behind this?

EricKaliberhall ago

Whaaaaa?

Hmm, yeah...

Why must a post include a link?

It's a submission rule. The rules are in the sidebar for more information.

Is this a new(ER) rule?

No, it is not.

When was this instated?

I believe from the beginning. For exact date I refer you to v/pizzagatemods.

And why can't the link be worldcorp?

Because that link contains CP. No CP is also a rule.

So now if you simply want to discuss something you can't do so without a link?

You are more then welcome to do that at v/pizzagatewhatever or v/AskPizzagate.

What is the thought process behind this?

Providing a link makes it easier for new users to join in the discussion (more information). If you have any other questions you are more then welcome to ask the moderator team.

wincraft71 ago

Cite the law or legal precedent where a video of a shirtless male child getting yelled at is illegal, or an unseen child behind a shower door getting yelled at is illegal. You can't because you're making up what's considered "illegal".

This is censorship.

Shizy ago

Um, actually in most jurisdictions across the USA emotional abuse (such as terrorizing a child like seen in the video) is considered child abuse according to statute and is illegal! Most jurisdictions don't intervene or begin a civil case for child abuse based on emotional abuse alone because it can be hard to document and prove in court, but more times than not emotional abuse occurs along with another form of abuse that is easier to document and "prove".

wincraft71 ago

Nope, we're talking about the video itself not the act. I was clear about that if you read my comments.