I shouldn't have to say it, if the mods had half a brain, but the Clinton Foundation is tied to BlackIvy Group through Cheryl Mills and leaked communications. BlackIvy works in Africa, Haiti and other third world countries, utilizing slave labor. Mangos is clearly code for children. Mango trees is clearly code for moms producing children for this trade.
It's related to Pizzagate because I say so and that should be good enough.
I've just had a number of posts I work hard on that are absolutely relevant to Pizzagate that were deleted. A year of that gets old and I new it was going to happen and that is why I created my subverse before /v/pizzagate even got off the ground.
Uranium One scandal is the trail to mining is the trail to human trafficking is the trail to pizzagate. So, when you start tying rich people and religious people to the mining, it should be obvious that it is relevant to pizzagate and if mods are deleting it, it is because they are either woefully ignorant of the subject, or they are operating according to a sinister agenda.
I respect that point of view, WoS. Unfortunately, we don't have that kind of leeway. This board regularly gets spammed to hell with complete disinfo and Voat's sidewide rules only allow us to remove what fails the submission rules. If we "use our judgement" and make a mistake, Voat has zero tolerance for it. So it's either a no-mod free for all, or mods bound by rules. Hopefully our new flair system will work better and result in much fewer removals.
I've been around long enough that we know I don't do it, myself, in this subverse. That's all I'm saying.
I'm not asking for the benefit of the doubt, either. I usually do provide a fair bit of sources. As a matter of fact, my own subverse is a pretty good trail of which sources I am looking at, at any given time. So, even if I've been light on sources once or twice (not that I remember), it is not like I make anything up completely out of nowhere and I am clearly not trying to derail the subverse.
view the rest of the comments →
thewebofslime ago
I shouldn't have to say it, if the mods had half a brain, but the Clinton Foundation is tied to BlackIvy Group through Cheryl Mills and leaked communications. BlackIvy works in Africa, Haiti and other third world countries, utilizing slave labor. Mangos is clearly code for children. Mango trees is clearly code for moms producing children for this trade.
It's related to Pizzagate because I say so and that should be good enough.
Vindicator ago
LOL. Mods didn't make the rules. There's a sticky up right now gathering feedback about Rule 3, though. Please chime in.
thewebofslime ago
I've just had a number of posts I work hard on that are absolutely relevant to Pizzagate that were deleted. A year of that gets old and I new it was going to happen and that is why I created my subverse before /v/pizzagate even got off the ground.
Uranium One scandal is the trail to mining is the trail to human trafficking is the trail to pizzagate. So, when you start tying rich people and religious people to the mining, it should be obvious that it is relevant to pizzagate and if mods are deleting it, it is because they are either woefully ignorant of the subject, or they are operating according to a sinister agenda.
Vindicator ago
I respect that point of view, WoS. Unfortunately, we don't have that kind of leeway. This board regularly gets spammed to hell with complete disinfo and Voat's sidewide rules only allow us to remove what fails the submission rules. If we "use our judgement" and make a mistake, Voat has zero tolerance for it. So it's either a no-mod free for all, or mods bound by rules. Hopefully our new flair system will work better and result in much fewer removals.
thewebofslime ago
I know there is a ton of crap that gets posted.
I've been around long enough that we know I don't do it, myself, in this subverse. That's all I'm saying.
I'm not asking for the benefit of the doubt, either. I usually do provide a fair bit of sources. As a matter of fact, my own subverse is a pretty good trail of which sources I am looking at, at any given time. So, even if I've been light on sources once or twice (not that I remember), it is not like I make anything up completely out of nowhere and I am clearly not trying to derail the subverse.