From what I have seen here, we are merely looking at a celebration of the modern art scene at the time. Soak in all of the pictures. Granted, virtually every work imitated by the guests has a certain occult or mythological reference. Wasn’t Dali an occult dabbler? Many popular artists from the 1920s on, were into Crowley and Theosophy (high brow satanism). I find modern photos, photo ops and such, have more interesting hidden details. Phillipine’s neckalaces shaped like Satan, cuffinks, symbology in the scenery or the frame of the photo. Everything that the Rockefeller and the Rothchilds do in photos and public appearances is way out there.
EDITM I’m not an apologist for the Rothchilds. I’m just not finding much in the photos from 72 that really surprised me. No hidden evidence. The broken doll and the antlers were the only thing that stood out, IMO.
view the rest of the comments →
GreenDell144 ago
From what I have seen here, we are merely looking at a celebration of the modern art scene at the time. Soak in all of the pictures. Granted, virtually every work imitated by the guests has a certain occult or mythological reference. Wasn’t Dali an occult dabbler? Many popular artists from the 1920s on, were into Crowley and Theosophy (high brow satanism). I find modern photos, photo ops and such, have more interesting hidden details. Phillipine’s neckalaces shaped like Satan, cuffinks, symbology in the scenery or the frame of the photo. Everything that the Rockefeller and the Rothchilds do in photos and public appearances is way out there.
EDITM I’m not an apologist for the Rothchilds. I’m just not finding much in the photos from 72 that really surprised me. No hidden evidence. The broken doll and the antlers were the only thing that stood out, IMO.
Blacksmith21 ago
Nothing about the manequin centerpiece and its closeness related to Abramovic events? Bueller? Bueller?
GreenDell144 ago
True. The cakes shaped like people were super gross.