No, there will be no justice. Who is going to arrest them? Who is going to prosecute them? Who is going to lock them up and make sure they stay locked up? Even tho there is tons and tons of evidence The elite are completely untouchable.
All modern presidents are, to some degree, compromised. Bear in mind, an agency named the (Secret) Service puts suited G men with guns around their families? Wouldn't they be Presidential Security if that was their actual job? Something tells me the Secret Service exists to protect secrets. Starting with their convenient original purpose of being the primary investigators of counterfeit currencies, which America's spies have always been masters of, going back to Washington's inner circle. There is no bigger secret than the fraudulent production of one's own currency, then ratified in whatever meager assets our young nation possessed. Any country is built on secrets and sacrifice. Ours is the most powerful nation in history, and our secrets are inevitably the darkest.
I should be clear, I'm not defending the Deep State, I'm simply explaining their motive. The President has the power to make anything that comes across the Resolute desk a matter of public knowledge with the stroke of a pen. Fearing a new Nuremberg, the swamp likely utilizes a handful of bad hombres inside the Secret Service to effectively hold the President's extended family at gunpoint. Killing an actual First Family member would be counterproductive, as it would just rally the President's base. Killing a President is a last resort, but the following is not exactly a controversial statement: The presidency has been stolen with lead once, if not twice. In total, four US Presidents have been shot, each beloved by the majority of the population. What does that tell you about how tight of a leash is kept?
Not sure if you're referencing the last line or just the fact that I was in full essay mode. Going a couple messages back, I should clarify what exactly a Whistleblower in Chief would be. First off, we need a bunch of political insiders. Specifically, talented people that've seen some shit. We also need them to have proof. I suggest rounding up this dream team about a decade before the election, giving them plenty of time to collect the requisite diet before they move over to the campaign. Every single campaign leadership member would be a source. Many other members of the campaign would be sources. All of this information would be handed over in an encrypted form to WikiLeaks. If the candidate is killed, it's all unencrypted. If the candidate loses, it's still unencrypted, but it comes in a trickle, with the best saved for last.
Of course, if the President wins, the information is shown to those that it's about. They either agree to cooperate and bring in additional evidence of wrongdoing in the government or it gets released in the Press Room, unannounced, that very day. If their information isn't good enough, their dirt comes out anyway, alongside whatever they disclosed. No matter what, WikiLeaks can decrypt it all 8 years after Inauguration day.
The result is a President capable of actually draining the swamp without getting killed. The best choice for President in this case is somebody with very few members of their extended family. The less targets the better.
view the rest of the comments →
unclassified ago
No, there will be no justice. Who is going to arrest them? Who is going to prosecute them? Who is going to lock them up and make sure they stay locked up? Even tho there is tons and tons of evidence The elite are completely untouchable.
therealkrispy ago
This is why our country needs a Whistleblower in Chief.
unclassified ago
I think Trump is compromised though.
therealkrispy ago
All modern presidents are, to some degree, compromised. Bear in mind, an agency named the (Secret) Service puts suited G men with guns around their families? Wouldn't they be Presidential Security if that was their actual job? Something tells me the Secret Service exists to protect secrets. Starting with their convenient original purpose of being the primary investigators of counterfeit currencies, which America's spies have always been masters of, going back to Washington's inner circle. There is no bigger secret than the fraudulent production of one's own currency, then ratified in whatever meager assets our young nation possessed. Any country is built on secrets and sacrifice. Ours is the most powerful nation in history, and our secrets are inevitably the darkest.
I should be clear, I'm not defending the Deep State, I'm simply explaining their motive. The President has the power to make anything that comes across the Resolute desk a matter of public knowledge with the stroke of a pen. Fearing a new Nuremberg, the swamp likely utilizes a handful of bad hombres inside the Secret Service to effectively hold the President's extended family at gunpoint. Killing an actual First Family member would be counterproductive, as it would just rally the President's base. Killing a President is a last resort, but the following is not exactly a controversial statement: The presidency has been stolen with lead once, if not twice. In total, four US Presidents have been shot, each beloved by the majority of the population. What does that tell you about how tight of a leash is kept?
unclassified ago
That says a lot.
therealkrispy ago
Not sure if you're referencing the last line or just the fact that I was in full essay mode. Going a couple messages back, I should clarify what exactly a Whistleblower in Chief would be. First off, we need a bunch of political insiders. Specifically, talented people that've seen some shit. We also need them to have proof. I suggest rounding up this dream team about a decade before the election, giving them plenty of time to collect the requisite diet before they move over to the campaign. Every single campaign leadership member would be a source. Many other members of the campaign would be sources. All of this information would be handed over in an encrypted form to WikiLeaks. If the candidate is killed, it's all unencrypted. If the candidate loses, it's still unencrypted, but it comes in a trickle, with the best saved for last.
Of course, if the President wins, the information is shown to those that it's about. They either agree to cooperate and bring in additional evidence of wrongdoing in the government or it gets released in the Press Room, unannounced, that very day. If their information isn't good enough, their dirt comes out anyway, alongside whatever they disclosed. No matter what, WikiLeaks can decrypt it all 8 years after Inauguration day.
The result is a President capable of actually draining the swamp without getting killed. The best choice for President in this case is somebody with very few members of their extended family. The less targets the better.