You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

carmencita ago

Upvoat! Is there not also a tie of Zampolli to Melania? Some kind of modeling tie in I think that was posted on here a few mos. ago. Don't remember how that turned out or if true. He is connected to all kinds of possibilities. Not trying to implicate Melania in anything like this, but remember they did have some kind of connection.

ASolo ago

Uh, hi. Noone noticed the thread two doors down talking about all of this?

Feels like the shit wasn't even posted.

letsdothis1 ago

ASolo, that's why I pulled this bit out and posted it as an item on it's own. I've been trying to get people to pay attention for ages about this. Notice, it's the image in the thumbnail that has grabbed the attention. (That's why it's important for us to keep the direct link to articles option.) I know from experience that sometimes when one writes complex information some material gets lost or forgotten.

Kudos to you because I know that you've been investigating this guy longer than I have.

ASolo ago

Oh, no, I totally get that, and at the time I didn't realize that even though mine was posted first what people are seeing is yours first, of course, but the read to upvoat ratio was really pissing me off just a bit because according to the views on my thread, over 25 upvoats for about 450 views, and at the time it was like 30 upvoats for only 60 views on your thread, even though your thread was obviously inspired by mine , as mine was by the one a few below that.

Please, I know it may look and sound as though I may be whining. But I'm not, I'm perplexed. The stats are telling me something and I don't know quite what it is and I tend to personalize it a little bit and it gets to me, but the statistics are telling me something else and I don't know what it is. I can't tell if it's the way threads are viewed, if it's something about the readers, or if it truly is something about my writing. One of the three, but I find VOATS voting habits to be in some sort of contradiction to it's interest in Pizzagate. Like I said there's something I just can't put my finger on what those stats are telling me.

I really do enjoy it when other work can be created from someone elses, like I said as my thread was and yours as well and I encourage it in every way please do not think that my slight tweaking was in any way against you, palmbeach, or even carmencita, I'm simply perplexed at what interests VOAT, because truly, with the help of palmbeach, have hit big parts of the top of the pyramid and we need to keep going at any cost.

letsdothis1 ago

Yes, I was looking at the stats too. Your post has many more viewers than mine. This is what I assume might be happening:

Because your post includes a Hollywood name like Nicole Kidman it will be found by many more people who are simply on the internet and looking for Hollywood gossip. Voat posts do show up in Google - that's why it's useful to put in a well known name in the title. Far less people will be looking for the United Nations. So, you will have a wider readership but not necessarily people who are interested in the 'pizzagate' issues. It's that simple I think.

It's also why I made my post now because the UN is in the news with the Oxfam story so I tried to ride that news opportunity.

ASolo ago

I can see that