You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

millennial_vulcan ago

Dear mods + all,

PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. Can we ALSO introduce new regulation banning folk (or at least administering a warning) from submitting a headline or url WITH NO EXPLANATION AS TO WHAT IT IS!!! This sh*t is driving me insane.

If you are going to throw up a link to a video or an article, SUMMARIZE what it is we are clicking on!!! Don't just paste a link and expect someone else to do all the work. Even if you copy + paste the synopsis from that video or article, that is better than just some dumba** rando link that for all we know COULD BE A VIRUS.

It is so obnoxious and lazy. I am sure I have missed many crucial cases because I am never going to click on some arbitrary link without knowing in advance what it is about. I don't know about you guys, but I have enough crap to click on in real life and don't need that when I come here.

Ok, rant over! But seriously please do something about this. PLEASE. Thank you!

@Vindicator @kevdude @think- @crensch @ESOTERICshade

think- ago

Thanks for your input, millennial_vulcan.

Rule 3 already states that video links need an explanation provided by OP.

When I understand you correctly, you would like to expand Rule 3, so that linked articles also require a summary?

The community might want to debate this.

@Vindicator @kevdude @Crensch @ESOTERICshade

ESOTERICshade ago

Rule 3 already states that video links need an explanation provided by OP.

I might also suggest a timestamp that targets the related material. With a timestamp a mod could check it real quick and make sure its not a spam post. As far as I know that has always been expected of videos. Sometimes a whole video is relevant and in that case OP can still pick any spot in the video that he knows a mod can easily understand.