Yes, the took an actual photo of the ranch and falsely labeled it a vineyard creating a fake photo. They were trying to match words from the email to the circumstances at Cibolo Creek Ranch and they had to lie because that is not a vineyard.
We know exactly what the circumstance behind this email is. It was sent on the day that Sanders was winning the New Hampshire primary, that's buckle up for a bad night bit. So to blunt his momentum, they are about to execute a political hit on Sanders by releasing this photo to the press
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/63/2e/d2/632ed27068a2181f2f091aa732d79621.jpg
It's Bernie Sanders at big lobbyist paid for confab at Martha's Vineyard. That's what pool parties by the Vineyard means. And wet work in being used metamphorically. It's a political hit on Sanders.
I do actually. There's no vineyard at that location. And there's several ways you can try and prove me wrong.
You can actually find any mention of Cibolo Creek Ranch producing wine on their site.
You can find any mention on the internet before the Podesta emails are out.
You can research Texas Wineries.
You can look up the Texas Grape Growers Association.
You can look at the Texas Acoholic Beverage Commission list of permits
You can call them up and inquire about a vacation and ask.
I do actually. There's no vineyard at that location. And there's several ways you can try and prove me wrong.
I don't really care one way or other, you were being so dogmatic so I was asking how you knew ... not gonna try to prove you wrong, I asked you first and you still haven't answered, how do you know?
It's pretty easy to be dogmatic about something that never happened. Nobody sent an email to John Podesta plotting the murder of Antonin Scalia. It's like asking me how much it cost me to repair my car from crashing into a unicorn. $0 because unicorns don't exist. (There's a part of you right now that wants to argue this fact, isn't there. A part of you that wants to ask, well how do you know? I'm right aren't I?)
Also I did some of that research the first time this ridiculously fake image appeared to show how easy it was to disprove.
You can bascially be dogmatic about this just based on context. The assertion put forth in that ridiculous conspiracy meme that you would refer to that place at The Vineyard as opposed to ....i dunno, The Ranch, is just laughable. There's only one place East Coast elites refer to as The Vineyard, capitalized, and that's Martha's Vineyard. Why would folks be referring to this ranch by incredibly obscure features of this ranch?
Some fraudster even put a fake vineyard in Google Maps when this first came out. People were fooled by that for a while too.
I understand, if the whole premise is suspect or not workable then everything else can end up a non sequiter. No I'm not like that (one to argue insufferably, the unicorn), not at all, that's one reason the conclusions I do make on certain things, that sound so absurd to you, should give you pause and concern. But you can't get past Kennedy, that's kind of ridiculous. I've never imbibed the whole 'Podesa killed Scalia and here we can prove it' thing, but it would not surprise me at all if he was murdered. Didn't know Google Maps could be fooled that easily, also, BTW. Wikipedia can't.
Wikipedia can, but certain articles can't. I think for obscure subjects you can edit them pretty directly in Wikipedia. More popular and controversial articles are usually locked and others have editors,I think.
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
So dumb.
Also that vineyard photo is fake. There's no vineyard at that ranch.
fusir ago
They are growing something https://binged.it/2ENx8oT
Are_we_sure ago
Yes they are.
Are they growing grapes? No they are not.
Do we know what The Vineyard means? Yes. It means Martha's Vineyard.
bopper ago
Growing grapes for wine is a big thing in this area ya big dummy.
http://marfapublicradio.org/blog/the-biggest-winery-in-texas-thrives-in-the-desert/
@fusir @Oh_Well_ian @srayzie @darkknight111
srayzie ago
That bastard went to my Assange post today too. In another sub! Why is he so interested all of a sudden? They must be getting really nervous.
bopper ago
Wow. The idiot flat out says they are NOT growing grapes ... how does he know ???
Stalking you sounds like.
Are_we__sure ago
Because I know that photo is a complete fake and I know how to read a promotional website?
bopper ago
The photo of the ranch isn't fake, you mean the words added for the meme? No you do NOT know what they are growing at the ranch!
Are_we__sure ago
Yes, the took an actual photo of the ranch and falsely labeled it a vineyard creating a fake photo. They were trying to match words from the email to the circumstances at Cibolo Creek Ranch and they had to lie because that is not a vineyard.
We know exactly what the circumstance behind this email is. It was sent on the day that Sanders was winning the New Hampshire primary, that's buckle up for a bad night bit. So to blunt his momentum, they are about to execute a political hit on Sanders by releasing this photo to the press https://i.pinimg.com/originals/63/2e/d2/632ed27068a2181f2f091aa732d79621.jpg
It's Bernie Sanders at big lobbyist paid for confab at Martha's Vineyard. That's what pool parties by the Vineyard means. And wet work in being used metamphorically. It's a political hit on Sanders.
bopper ago
Yeah I remember you saying this, but again, you are stating they are not growing grapes, how do you know? You don't.
Are_we__sure ago
I do actually. There's no vineyard at that location. And there's several ways you can try and prove me wrong.
You can actually find any mention of Cibolo Creek Ranch producing wine on their site. You can find any mention on the internet before the Podesta emails are out. You can research Texas Wineries. You can look up the Texas Grape Growers Association. You can look at the Texas Acoholic Beverage Commission list of permits
You can call them up and inquire about a vacation and ask.
bopper ago
I don't really care one way or other, you were being so dogmatic so I was asking how you knew ... not gonna try to prove you wrong, I asked you first and you still haven't answered, how do you know?
Are_we__sure ago
It's pretty easy to be dogmatic about something that never happened. Nobody sent an email to John Podesta plotting the murder of Antonin Scalia. It's like asking me how much it cost me to repair my car from crashing into a unicorn. $0 because unicorns don't exist. (There's a part of you right now that wants to argue this fact, isn't there. A part of you that wants to ask, well how do you know? I'm right aren't I?)
Also I did some of that research the first time this ridiculously fake image appeared to show how easy it was to disprove.
You can bascially be dogmatic about this just based on context. The assertion put forth in that ridiculous conspiracy meme that you would refer to that place at The Vineyard as opposed to ....i dunno, The Ranch, is just laughable. There's only one place East Coast elites refer to as The Vineyard, capitalized, and that's Martha's Vineyard. Why would folks be referring to this ranch by incredibly obscure features of this ranch?
Some fraudster even put a fake vineyard in Google Maps when this first came out. People were fooled by that for a while too.
bopper ago
Lots of these resorts, as you know, grown their own food for the local chefs, like Rancho Santana near Nicaragua, gonna go surf there one day.
bopper ago
I understand, if the whole premise is suspect or not workable then everything else can end up a non sequiter. No I'm not like that (one to argue insufferably, the unicorn), not at all, that's one reason the conclusions I do make on certain things, that sound so absurd to you, should give you pause and concern. But you can't get past Kennedy, that's kind of ridiculous. I've never imbibed the whole 'Podesa killed Scalia and here we can prove it' thing, but it would not surprise me at all if he was murdered. Didn't know Google Maps could be fooled that easily, also, BTW. Wikipedia can't.
Are_we__sure ago
Wikipedia can, but certain articles can't. I think for obscure subjects you can edit them pretty directly in Wikipedia. More popular and controversial articles are usually locked and others have editors,I think.
bopper ago
Yeah, that sounds right.