Also the fact that the corrinor pronounced his death as cardiac infarction without even seeing the body, and then ordered that it would never need to be looked at.
Yeah. That is for sure. Colby also reveals the toxin would not appear in an autopsy – so there would be "no way of perceiving that the target was hit".
Then why wouldnt they let anyone view the body? A heart attack wouldn't show any outward signs of damage so viewing the body wouldnt be an issue. But if his throat were cut or he was beaten to death, that might be a little tougher to hide.
Who knows what else happened to him besides the heart attack. Maybe he had taken part in some rough foreplay of some kind or maybe they had tried to kill him in some other way before using the gun. But the gun is the cleanest solution.
Projection. Your only proof is your opinion. Are you by chance a leftist? Leftists seem to believe in the inferior notion that "muh feewlings" takes precedence over uncovering the truth. The correct opinion to have is that anything that gets in the way of finding the truth must be crushed.
Also, I'm basing my thoughts off the absolute truth of "only the guilty have something to hide".
No, I wouldn't go there. They do get severely spooked afterwards though. Look at families of JFK, Diana, Seth Rich, Paddock, etc. Combine emotional shock of death with someone hinting at trouble if they raise trouble.
Yes, but that's not unusual for politicos is it? Here's how his death was reported in Politico
**>Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia dead at 79
Obama is expected to face fierce resistance to any nominee to replace the conservative justice.**
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has died at the age of 79, leaving the nation's highest court split between Republican and Democratic appointees, and sparking a partisan battle over whether President Barack Obama should nominate a replacement in a presidential election year.
Then, that would be a complete turn around from our original suspicions.
Clinton is certainly sketchy, given her defense of a rapist in her early career but even Podesta distanced himself from her behaviour regarding her connections to Sid Blumenthal and the Bhengazi debacle, he referred to David Brock (associated with Sid Blumenthal) as sleazy... Doesn't seem like something a deviant would say.
view the rest of the comments →
fusir ago
Also the fact that the corrinor pronounced his death as cardiac infarction without even seeing the body, and then ordered that it would never need to be looked at.
darkknight111 ago
The refusal to autopsy is due to this:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/world/644439/CIA-heart-attack-gun-Mary-Embree-Frank-Church-William-Colby/amp
Only someone who is highly trained in forensics AND knows about this weapon would know what to look for.
Evidence destruction.
carmencita ago
Yeah. That is for sure. Colby also reveals the toxin would not appear in an autopsy – so there would be "no way of perceiving that the target was hit".
Coloradical2 ago
Then why wouldnt they let anyone view the body? A heart attack wouldn't show any outward signs of damage so viewing the body wouldnt be an issue. But if his throat were cut or he was beaten to death, that might be a little tougher to hide.
carmencita ago
Who knows what else happened to him besides the heart attack. Maybe he had taken part in some rough foreplay of some kind or maybe they had tried to kill him in some other way before using the gun. But the gun is the cleanest solution.
KnightsofHubris ago
You're saying his family is in the conspiracy?
darkknight111 ago
No, shilltard. I'm saying the lack of an autopsy for someone that important is proof of something to hide.
KnightsofHubris ago
His family requested no autopsy. Are you saying that this proves his family had something to hide.
Your proof seems merely to be your opinion.
darkknight111 ago
Projection. Your only proof is your opinion. Are you by chance a leftist? Leftists seem to believe in the inferior notion that "muh feewlings" takes precedence over uncovering the truth. The correct opinion to have is that anything that gets in the way of finding the truth must be crushed.
Also, I'm basing my thoughts off the absolute truth of "only the guilty have something to hide".
Scirel ago
No, I wouldn't go there. They do get severely spooked afterwards though. Look at families of JFK, Diana, Seth Rich, Paddock, etc. Combine emotional shock of death with someone hinting at trouble if they raise trouble.
RedPillEh ago
Another Podesta email discussing Scalia's replacement w/ Obama WH counsel & Open Society President
KnightsofHubris ago
Anything unusual about this?
RedPillEh ago
KnightsofHubris ago
Yes, but that's not unusual for politicos is it? Here's how his death was reported in Politico
**>Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia dead at 79
FlippantLaker ago
Also the fact he was a violent rapist.
GreenDell144 ago
These rumors are filled with interesting points, but just rumors until more is exposed, unless you read something I didn't.
FlippantLaker ago
Let me find an article for you. https://pedophilesdownunder.com/tag/justice-antonin-scalia/
GreenDell144 ago
Thanks. I think I read that before. Fiona is a hero in my book.
Are_we_sure ago
100% irrelevant to your claim. And the choice to have no autopsy came from Scalia's family
LostUnicorn ago
You have to be paid. Do you spend the hours you arent on here loathing yourself and your life?
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
Fagget. Yea you, you Fagget.
Q2anon ago
lol at this shill who can't even spell faggot.
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
Tranny Ho!
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
LOL I DO"T SPELL RIGHT SO THAT I CAN SEE WHOS A LIBERAL TWOEL HEAD NIGGERFAGGET JEW!!! LOL
Q2anon ago
Enjoy the chemtrails we'll be spraying over your house. Extra special for ya.
Oh_Well_ian ago
lol ok shitbag... He was a Supreme Court Justice and that decision is not the family's to make
gentronseven ago
It should be law that all politicians who die in office are given an autopsy and their death investigated with all information made public.
Of course, this would get the obamas and clintons of the world killed by angry mobs
FlippantLaker ago
Then, that would be a complete turn around from our original suspicions.
Clinton is certainly sketchy, given her defense of a rapist in her early career but even Podesta distanced himself from her behaviour regarding her connections to Sid Blumenthal and the Bhengazi debacle, he referred to David Brock (associated with Sid Blumenthal) as sleazy... Doesn't seem like something a deviant would say.
FlippantLaker ago
Unless he really was attending the Belgian hunting parties.