Allegedly.
This long dead permanent A+ lister who was in one, if not, the greatest band of all times used to travel to a country just to have sex with tween and teen girls. He said it brought him to a new state of mind. Apparently there are several children of his he never met from those rapes that are still living in that country and are about to sue his estate.
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/02/blind-item-4_5.html The comments say it all.
How long has Paul been paying off families to keep this shit quiet?
Related to pizzagate because many believe the Beatles were a psychological operation run by the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations. Tavistock is believed to be the heart of Pizzagate. https://www.henrymakow.com/beatles_were_mind_control.html
I predict there's going to be a massive ff to bury this if and when the news gets out....
I'm also really devastated.
view the rest of the comments →
wtf_is_happening ago
Since reading a bit of Miles Mathis I have come to suspect the Beatles were an astoundingly successful psyop, and the public's image of them is way off the reality. Even in the official story, George was very young himself when he joined the Beatles. My memory's a bit hazy but I thought one of the reasons the Beatles had to leave Germany back in their Hamburg days was that George was only fifteen ie. still legally a child when they got arrested there for possession of drugs.
millennial_vulcan ago
So much, more than the public could ever digest, has been written about them over the years. We all think we know them. But we don't.
Keeping to George and that whole India/guru phase - that was sketch as F. The Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was a known kiddie rapist. https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/maharishi-inspired-beatles-but-died-leaving-292433 And what exactly the F were Mia and Prudence Farrow doing hanging out with them anyway during that time? So random and suspect.
Everything has been a lie. It feels like a punch to the gut.
IIJOSEPHXII ago
John, Paul, George and Ringo were all killed and replaced in 1964 by doubles who had been performing and acting as them since 1963.
bopper ago
No, there's only overwhelming evidence that Paul was replaced, none of the others. And that was 1966.
IIJOSEPHXII ago
Sir Paul has overwhelming evidence that was him before 1966, because that was actually him before 1966. So if you're trying to make a case against Sir Faul appearing in 1966 he's got tons of evidence in his defence.
The conspiracy theory was devised by the people who killed The Beatles so it would get the same reaction you are showing. There are also plenty of shills trying to police the investigation so people come to the same conclusion.
bopper ago
Not trying to be argumentative but I've researched death of James Paul McCartney extensively. He was replaced in 1966 by William Shepard. Aka Billy Shears. If you read the book Memoirs of Billy Shears it will be very helpful, you can start w/ the condensed version "Billy's Back." Here's a good interview w/ a guy who's researched it probably more than anyone. There are several different good ones out there w/ him. I am certainly open to looking at any evidence you might have but it has to be solid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DhIQKaqOmo
IIJOSEPHXII ago
Of course there's a fake breadcrumb trail to lead people away from the truth. I don't really care what his name was, he's in A Hard Day's Night and on the cover of the album of the same name. Watch the movie where he turns to the camesra and goes "ZAP!" That's the imposter Faul.
I haven't read any books on the subject, but I have been watching exhaustively the movies concerts and TV appearances and I can tell the difference between Paul and Faul even in his prosthetic make up.
Paul and the rest of the real Beatles are gone before the second visit to the US and they never even picked up their MBEs - that's very clear.
bopper ago
Well looks like we've reached an impasse. No problem, but I couldn't disagree more.