You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

cutelobster ago

So Q predicted a false flag at the Superbowl which didn't happen. This is now being spun as Q prevented a false flag at the Superbowl from happening. By this logic any bad prediction of a false flag can be dressed up as an act of prevention. It seems impossible for some to accept that Q is (often) making bad predictions.

migratorypatterns ago

I agree.

Q has been wrong before. S/he's also been right. Q also gives very detailed background information at times. It's good to keep up with his/her posts because the s/he does have his/her finger on pizzagate.