They are talking then about a video the DM wrote about 5 yrs. ago? Why? Someone is posting an old video evidently. Kind of screwy. But really the child needs to be found. The police should look into who that child is and who is posting the video. Facebook could release the name of the account could they not? But at this point......Very odd indeed.
Totally unrelated: I just heard that Friday the stocks fell at 666 by closing? I am not good at any of the market news, but that number was amazing. That # made me sit up straight. OK. so way too early, what does it mean that it first appeared in 2013? Don't get how it relates. Fuzzy Brain Morning.
trying to think what the connection might be too. Don't know why first released in 2013. That was also the year the Maddie McCann e-fits were randomly introduced to the public too. Perhaps the 'fear mongering pedos are everywhere' narrative was being heavily pushed that year?
view the rest of the comments →
millennial_vulcan ago
These images/video first appeared on FB in 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2297430/Fury-child-porn-goes-viral-Facebook-16-000-shares.html
carmencita ago
They are talking then about a video the DM wrote about 5 yrs. ago? Why? Someone is posting an old video evidently. Kind of screwy. But really the child needs to be found. The police should look into who that child is and who is posting the video. Facebook could release the name of the account could they not? But at this point......Very odd indeed.
carmencita ago
Totally unrelated: I just heard that Friday the stocks fell at 666 by closing? I am not good at any of the market news, but that number was amazing. That # made me sit up straight. OK. so way too early, what does it mean that it first appeared in 2013? Don't get how it relates. Fuzzy Brain Morning.
millennial_vulcan ago
trying to think what the connection might be too. Don't know why first released in 2013. That was also the year the Maddie McCann e-fits were randomly introduced to the public too. Perhaps the 'fear mongering pedos are everywhere' narrative was being heavily pushed that year?