Was on 4chan this morning and noticed a thread where Ana Kasparin was railing on technology that allows porn producers to put other people's faces on porn videos. Of course she was one of the victims of this tech, but it started me thinking about all of it. - This feels like a damage control mechanism. It feels like it may be a way to start the conversation and control the narrative ahead of some shit that might get revealed soon. i.e. "Oh that's not Hillary's face on the woman fucking the 12 year old girl." "They used that new technology." "Oh that's not the senator!" " They put his face on that using that new porn technology!" - Anyway, just wanted to put it out there that it felt wrong. We all know that tech's been out there for a long time, but why is TYT just now raising a stink about it?
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/158688988
view the rest of the comments →
carmencita ago
This needs to be UPVOATED. Now. This is most def a way for them to do Damage Control ahead of time. This is Seriously going to be a Huge Problem if we don't nip it in the bud. NOW.
21yearsofdigging ago
Yup, totally agree!
carmencita ago
I should have noted that I copied it from chan link, I assumed people would know. Anyway, it is frightening. They are trying to kill evidence before it is even presented. Like, don't even bother now, because it will already be considered questionable or even Fake. Wow.
Are_we__sure ago
This is an amazing statement.
What evidence? The evidence that someone just MADE UP on this thread? The evidence that you just believed/imagined existed? That evidence?
Am I try to kill this evidence before it even exists by pointing out it doesn't exist? AM I IN ON IT?
Wow that is frightening!
You mean images can be manipulated through software! MY GOD!
http://usskirk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Barack-ObamaIMG_0131-2.jpg
https://mutisyajr.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/obamacrowley.jpg
http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/picture/604025/85235377.jpg